Some people believe that pop stars deserve to earn more money than classical music performers. Some disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There is a heated debate about whether the high pay for trending music stars is worth their abilities or it is classical musician who deserves a better earning. From my personal standpoint, notwithstanding that both viewpoints bear their own merits, I would content with the former.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that there are plenty of reasons backed up for pop stars’ high income. First and foremost, it can be attributed to their cramped schedule with regular recording time and countless performance tour. Not only top-tier singers have to endure heavier workload and longer working hours but they also have the responsibility to satisfy the audience’s demands. Hence, the more their salary, the more their contribution to the entertainment industry. Secondly, we are all acknowledge that trending singer normally have a short-lived career, which means that they only earn the most during their golden time. That is the explanation for why most of them would do their best in these prosperous years so as to make ends meet for the rest of their life. In the case of a famous Korean boy group - HOT, the press are now considered their style and music as out-dated and are no longer in the mass public’s preference, and it is cleared that their income is a lot lower than that in their golden period.
On the second hand, we can not take the talents of classical musician for granted. All classical performers have to go under persistent training with endless practicing hours and strict requirements with the aim to meet the highly demand of the classical field. Moreover, it has been widely considered for centuries that classical music is the wealth’s priority. Since this genre mostly serve for those from the upper class, classical singers’ income go in accordance with their audiences’ budget.
In the nutshell, I would advocate that pop stars make a higher living due to their major contribution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-01 | nhattram39 | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-01 | nhattram39 | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-01 | nhattram39 | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-01 | nhattram39 | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-01 | nhattram39 | 84 | view |
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football But others think taking part in individual sports is better like swimming Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime Others however argue that the circumstances of an individual crime and the motivation for committing it should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment D 84
- Internet access helps young people and workers achieve their education and work goals more easily than before To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The pictures below show the process of making clothes from recycled plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Most people are not interested in how their food has been produced They only care about how much it costs How true is this statement What influences people when they buy food 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 726, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...do their best in these prosperous years so as to make ends meet for the rest of their li...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0375 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7519022695 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590625 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0427988932 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.142857143 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116717965433 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0452428706461 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0283644508956 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0806175721481 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0217790978187 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.