Some people think that organizing international sport events is good for the host country while others think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion

Essay topics:

Some people think that organizing international sport events is good for the host country while others think it is bad. Discuss both views and state your opinion.

The popularity of the Olympic games is all over the place in this day and age. Along with this, there is a heated debate about whether the disadvantages of hosting such a global competitions would overshadow the merits that it could bring to the host country and vice versa. From my personal standpoint, both views bear their own reasons.

On the one hand, it is undeniable that holding worldwide sport competitions might bring a wealth of benefits to the host nations. First of all, it is the country’s once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to promote their indigenous culture and custom on a global scale on the ground that people from all over the world will not only spare time following their favourite athletes but also peruse the host’s specialities. Secondly, if the event is operated without let or hindrance, the host country’s international reputation can be improved considerably. As a consequence, this would have positive influence on the tourism sector since it would intrigue people’s curiosity to further discover about the nation. Brazil is the prime example of this, after organizing the Olympic Games 2016 in Rio De Janeiro, its tourist industry has gone through an unforgettable period of continuous growth and prosperity.

On the other hand, in spite of such alluring benefits, there are also significant drawbacks that the host country should take into consideration. On top of that, it is the financial demand of these events that might lead the host nation to the verge of crisis. We should all be acknowledged that the cost of hosting a sport events is prohibitively expensive, the country has to carefully manage the stream of money so as to satisfied internal and external activities at the same time. In the case of Greece, not only the country ran into bad debt after hosting the Olympic games in 2004 but it also lost most of the citizen’s trust into the existed government at that moment. This problem can be further exaggerated in some developing nations with limited financial resources, where outsized spending could result in accusations of misspending and corruption.

In a nutshell, it is my opinion that there are both negative and positive aspects of hosting a global sport competitions and the organizer itself should make their own decision due to the aforementioned pros and cons

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-07-08 nhattram39 73 view
2021-10-14 labaongoc 84 view
2021-07-02 thisisme20 73 view
2021-07-02 thisisme20 73 view
Essays by user nhattram39 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'competition'?
Suggestion: competition
... disadvantages of hosting such a global competitions would overshadow the merits that it cou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 162, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...take into consideration. On top of that, it is the financial demand of these even...
^^
Line 5, column 326, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'event'?
Suggestion: event
...ledged that the cost of hosting a sport events is prohibitively expensive, the country...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 417, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...to carefully manage the stream of money so as to satisfied internal and external activit...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, as to, first of all, in spite of, on the other hand, on top of that

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1953.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 382.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11256544503 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95891778946 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557591623037 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 610.2 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.3174119643 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.5 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2857142857 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20498790049 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663379080074 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385612934938 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121572953634 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0228312947325 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.