Some people believe that preserving natural environment is crucial, but make no effort to do so (reasons and solutions).
'Environment is a significant resource that we can not afford to damage'. One of the burning issue today relates to that, if saving environment is so crucial; then why people do not give contribution? In this essay, I will give the main reason for this phenomenon and suggest some practical solutions that an individual can apply.
TO commence with, there are some people who are so much involved into their work loads and do not get chance to put an initiative regarding the environment safety. However, people are aware about the consequences which can be faced in future if they would not put efforts in preserving environment. Similarly, people either get busy into their work or into family then they do not get time saving the surrounding. In addition, this problem can be sorted out by taking care of small things which would help the environment indirectly. If an individual will take initiative, and use showers instead of bath, use low voltage lights rather than high voltage and, drive cars with CNG not with petrol. For instance, in japan most of the people are busy in their lifestyle and apply these simple methods and give their contribution towards environment.
Probing ahead, there are also some people who believe that, the preservation of environment should be done by government. In contrast, people also say that government is the one who can provide good infrastructure to avoid the instinct problems of the environment. Some proportion of people say that, government should make stringent laws and neither wastage of water should be done nor of any other resource that affects the natural environment. Moreover, this thinking of people can be changed by making awareness among them by giving counciling, making slogans that they can be aware of their responsibilities regarding environment.
Eventually, it is an complex issue but, I tend to believe that, every individual should give their contribution in preserving the environment either the initiative is less or more because, environment is everything which we are dependent on.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-08-08 | Rajan khehra | 73 | view |
- In many countries, women no longer feel need to get married. Some people believe that some women are able to earn their own income and do not require security a man cqn bring. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of a major university in 2012 75
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country 73
- Blood sports have became a hot topic for debate in recent years. As society develops it is increasingly seen as uncivilized activity and cruel to the helpless animals that are killed. Blood sports should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 100
- Nowadays people throw away old things and adapt new things Do the disadvantages of throwaway society outweigh any possible economic advantage 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 19, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...rding environment. Eventually, it is an complex issue but, I tend to believe th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, regarding, similarly, so, then, for instance, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1708.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12912912913 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89874888313 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522522522523 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1528210635 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7857142857 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253976088495 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0856880011855 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670851138816 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150550538223 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415454321349 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.