The issue as to whether high-quality certifications in range of decisive expertises such as doctors and engineers should work in their country to contribute or should go on studying abroad with teritiary education has remained a source of controversy. Personally, I would agree with two sides from these situations.
On the one hand, we have to the assumption with the notion that Living in their country to be the beginning of a career path from now on will bring them with many advantageous impacts beacause of its convenience and flexibility. In terms of personal life, They will have much time to reunion with their family after heavy workload and wait for a long time owing to the traffic jams on peak hours after time off work. They all need to be a shoulder to share with their emotions and harships they had suffered. So on, they will get that accounted time with their family. In terms of moving around and other angles, They don't live far away from home and can commute easily, simultaneously, the reduction of fuels and saving costs of shopping needs are the contributors to cover a part of daily expenses with those that have a normal or sufficient wages.
On the other hand, I would side steadily with those who think that high-quailty chosen professions should have a freedom to work in another country. Despite having a fact that they suffered from obstacles about isolation or loneliness when they meet no relatives. So I still hold fast to the belief that It will make more useful merits than working in home life. First of all, you access to soft skills such as analytical skills, though-provoking, interpersonal communication and Independence is a key role in point. You will be more responsible for your life and are seasoned with experience to give some decisions in both life and work. Furthermore, You will improve English skills and detail other languages to serve the needs of increasingly integrated market among developed countries. This can result in committing themselves for an international organisation to receive the salary is many times higher when working in home life.
In conclusion, Working in their country where they were trained or working in developed countries after tertiary education all bring them with significant merits. However, Each person should choose the best decision as well as meet the needs of their own interests to not appear as counterproductive situations.
- The advantages brought by the spread of English as a global language with outweigh the disadvantage To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 78
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this massage 56
- In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face to face contact with others Is this a positive or negative development 89
- Competitiveness is a positive quality for people in most societies How does competitiveness affect individuals Is it a positive or negative trend 84
- It is better for college students to live far away from home than live at home with their parents Do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
The issue as to whether high-quality certifications in range of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 619, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...of moving around and other angles, They dont live far away from home and can commute...
^^^^
Line 3, column 113, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'freedom'.
Suggestion: freedom
...-quailty chosen professions should have a freedom to work in another country. Despite hav...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, still, well, as to, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 41.998997996 169% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2018.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 403.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00744416873 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90331275983 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573200992556 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.819886499 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.125 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1875 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0625 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293505619775 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0957469998707 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710832476106 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189470648598 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285752377673 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.