Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Some people think that specialists like doctors or businessmen should be enforced to start their careers in the country where they studied. Others believe that they should have the perk to work in another country if they want. In this essay, I’ll discuss both views and give my opinions.
On the one hand, keeping professionals remain in a country is an advantage, due to the fact that those people will dedicate and help to contribute to the general development. For example, in the USA, there are many foreign students who come from different countries and when they finish their training or higher education, they land jobs right in that country and work as professionals in varied fields. Therefore, this nation can they will benefit from those students, who are skillful and intelligent. Moreover, it seems that it’s easier for experts to start their businesses and have stable incomes in the place where they did their training because they are familiar with and know how to expand their careers. While they are in their training methods, they will have the chance to intern with many big companies and organizations in that country.
On the other hand, if they can work in another country, I believe that they will have more opportunities to gain potential and promote their job performance. When you just work in a country, your job will mostly involve that country, you cannot express and progress yourselves. For example, a number of experts, who graduated in developing countries or even developed countries still want to move to industrial countries to work because they can broaden their horizons and have the chance to advance their skills, as well as jobs by joining more big projects, international tasks, and conventions.
To sum up, the positive aspect is that a country will be grown by those people, who are professionals such as engineers and masters. However, it’s not essential to always work in that country, but I think professionals should work in different countries to achieve more advantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-26 | 123456abcxyz | 73 | view |
- Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- Some people think watching movies is a waste of time Do you agree or disagree 56
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions Do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people say that money should be the main measure of success and personal status and wealthy people should be in high demand To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish Discuss both these views and give your 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 81, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... country will be grown by those people, who are professionals such as engineers and mas...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, i think, such as, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 48.0 24.0651302605 199% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1701.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0625 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69962460385 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514880952381 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.889437147 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.846153846 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8461538462 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3076923077 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.497572533863 0.244688304435 203% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187343505967 0.084324248473 222% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112259910083 0.0667982634062 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.330360798159 0.151304729494 218% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131292241535 0.056905535591 231% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.