Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
To a certain extent, I agree that do some reading can have a more positive effect than watching TV or playing computer games for youngsters. However, I also think that children are so used to visual input - on TV, video games, and so on. There are plenty of kids who wouldn’t even try to read a book, moreover, I suppose childhood was meant to play and having fun.
There are two main reasons why I agree that reading books plays an important role in the child's development. One reason is that it can broaden their literacy horizons, they can know about everything in the world from the past to nowadays, about people from all walks of life. In the process of studying English, for example, kids may have better reading and writing skills when they have already read news, magazines, stories since they were little. Because of this, parents should spend a short amount of time every ngiht with children to telling them bedtime stories. It not only helps youngsters easily to sleep but also develop literacy appreciation towards reading. Furthermore, one of the great things about words is that they will have to use their imagination. This will eventually brings more benefits to kids in the future due to the fact they can solve difficult tasks quickly and smartly.
Apart from the practical merits expressed above, I believe that adolescents should play and have the happiest time rather than force them to study or do some tedious things. Firstly, playing computer games can also help solving problems and even blowing off some steam. Secondly, television brings the best comedians, musicians and actors into our home. Programs can be entertaining and enjoyable but at the same time, they can be informative and educational. For instance, new coverage makes the public aware of events around the world so it can widen their knowledge by watching them.
In conclusion, for the reasons I have mentioned above, I strongly believe that although reading stories from a book will gain a better understanding and awareness, childhood is still always the most innocent and playful time of a person. Therefore, we should not limit those precious moments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-07 | Phuong1810 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | dieulinhxinhgai | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-25 | pwlihnkt | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-18 | bepmy2992004 | 67 | view |
- The maps show two different plans designed for a conference room 79
- The diagrams below show the present building of a college and the plan for changes to the college site in the future 78
- The table below shows information about department stores and online stores in Australia in 2011 89
- It is said that people who read books for pleasure have better imagination and language skills than people who watch TV Do you agree or disagree 84
- The diagram shows production of sugar by a german company for supermarkets and restaurants 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 790, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'bring'
Suggestion: bring
...their imagination. This will eventually brings more benefits to kids in the future due...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 221, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to solve' or 'solve'.
Suggestion: to solve; solve
...y, playing computer games can also help solving problems and even blowing off some stea...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, apart from, for example, for instance, i suppose, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1791.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94751381215 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53217350271 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613259668508 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8554110304 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.352941176 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2941176471 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0588235294 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309795944017 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855085321261 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104304866734 0.0667982634062 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195098282647 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0769730452875 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.