Some people believe that students should study in groups. Others think that they should
study alone. What are the benefits of studying in groups and studying alone? Which way is
more effective?
Studying methodologies have been capturing a great deal of public attention due to the ramifications on learners’ academic progress. Although both studying alone and in groups could have many advantages, group learning’s are more pronounced.
On the one hand, there are many benefits when it comes to studying in groups. First, group learning means that individuals with outstanding academic attainments could offset the knowledge insufficiency of those with subpar ones. This would lead to better lession comprehension in lower-level students, acting as an incentive for their making progress. Second, since each student in group have their own perspective towards a particular topic, group studying enables them to exchange ideas, thereby cultivating their critical thinking and idea-conveying skills, which are the most crutial elements in better future employment prospects. For example, students in a group have a penchant for expressing their own opinions and gauging their pros and cons of each one to settle down with the most efficient solution, which sharpens their analysis and presentation skills, which are the essentials for any occupations.
On the other hand, it true that studying alone could have more positve consequences than in groups. First, because group learning consists of many people, which minimises the degree of concentration in each learner, studying alone could reverse that. In fact, this learning method would consequently rise students’ studying productivity and commitment, fueling increased academic attainments. In addition, in comparison with group studying which usually compels individuals to adhere to a specific universal way, self-learning students could study based on their personal preferences. If that is the case, students could feel the convenience and freedom, leading to better academic performances.
In conclusion, I believe studying along offers better efficiency in contrast with styding in groups. Additionally, students should spend more time on self-studying for better academic capacities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-18 | grahamoneil | 78 | view |
| 2018-09-18 | grahamoneil | 67 | view |
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why it is the case?. What can be done to attract more local people to visit these places. 78
- The price of a cup of coffee in six cities from 2010 to 2014 in Australia 57
- Some people think that international travel makes them prejudiced rather than broad-minded.Give reasons why people fail to benefit from travel and how to improve the understanding ofcountries you visit. 73
- Some people think that studying from the past teaches us nothing about today’s life. Others argue that the history is a valuable source of information. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- Global environmental issues are the responsibility of rich nations not of poorer nations Do you agree with this opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 23, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'trues'?
Suggestion: trues
...y occupations. On the other hand, it true that studying alone could have more pos...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, second, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1776.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.92 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13431899391 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576666666667 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.2703943556 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.857142857 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35714285714 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316086477427 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127465791369 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742035460292 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210098322779 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557655110097 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.06 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.