Some people believe that teenagers should be required to do unpaid community work in their free time. This can benefit teenagers and the community as well. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
People’s opinions diverge regarding whether adolescents should be trained as volunteers in community campaigns in their spare time. Personally, I completely agree with this view.
For a variety of reasons, it would be beneficial to individuals in both physical and intellectual aspects. Firstly, due to the current education curriculums is in favor of academic knowledge, therefore students lack numerous practical experiences about life and work. This means that it is extremely worthwhile to permit teenagers to take part in and become a part of valuable movements that might provide a plethora of meritable knowledge for undergraduates in the later journeys of life. For example, it is significant value for teenagers if they have a plan to apply for prestigious scholarships overseas because volunteering and extra-curricular activities are highly appreciated and it will have their profile be more splendid in the eyes of recruiters.
Secondly, in today’s modern and technological world, people are more likely to be attracted by video games, social media, and other useless pleasures, therefore leading to undesirable diseases related to obesity, eyes, and mental problems. If individuals have an opportunity to engage in unpaid community work as volunteers, they can gain fundamental etiquette and exceptional abilities which is a bedrock of future jobs such as teamwork, public speaking, and be more responsible with their behaviors. As a result, when residents and social events improve, eventually prosper and contribute to society as a whole.
In summary, it seems to me that both individuals and the community will be beneficial when allowing adolescents to be volunteers in unpaid events.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-08-17 | fdsugb22 | view | |
2023-06-21 | shwetarani | 56 | view |
2023-05-08 | tmai41587 | view | |
2023-02-05 | katyhot1 | view | |
2022-12-20 | jahidhumayun@gmail.com | 67 | view |
- One of the best ways to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- In many countries today people in cities either live alone or in small family units rather than in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 78
- One of the best ways to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- In some countries many more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past Do you think this is a positive or negative development 95
- People tend to work longer hours nowadays Working long hours has a negative effect on themselves their families and the society so working hours should be restricted Do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in summary, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1459.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61153846154 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23106912528 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626923076923 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.0774929215 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.9 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1 7.06120827912 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20542637926 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733560350537 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565860162076 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131372811811 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049526433519 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.0 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.