Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime Others however argue that the circumstances of an individual crime and the motivation for committing it should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment D

It is believed that a specific kind of crime should be dealed with a particular sentence. However, some people argue that the law have to be flexible under many cases and the original reasons for commiting a crime when reconsidering to accuse a guilty individual. In my opinion, both statements greatly convinved me for some reasons.
First of all, law works quite strictly and fair because the law system has been developing for many centuries and it keeps fixing the rule when acknowledge a hole in the system. Most of the time, crime are treated fairly for what he did under the court, from thieve , robber to murder and nation betrayer are sentenced to months, years, decades or death. For example, the new law of Vietnam has just enforced to ban driving after drinking alcohol because car accidents mostlty caused by drunk drivers. According to that, Drivers’s license will be revoked for 10 to 12 months and fined for a fixed a mount of money which is enough for him not to drink when he is in traffic.
When it comes to Vietnam’s Law, however, there are some differences from others western nations. In Vietnam, the man who hold all power under the court is tribunal president which means he decides the crime’s fate. This is a biggest hold in Vietnam law because if the holder is a dedicated and fair person, he can assess the circumstances correctly. However, if he is a corrupted judge, the consequences would be unfair. In contrast, in western nations, the power belongs to 12 juries who are 12 different people in the society from the slowest class to the higher ones. The court would be much more fair because 12 juries cannot be choosen in advance so that they can judge a situation most accurately. For instance, there were many precedents in Vietnam law that pushed 2 aldolencents to the jail for 3 years because of breads stealing and a man was kicked into the prison because he stealed a duck from his neighbor. Hence, the key point is that the power has to be given to a appropriate holder.
In conclusion, the law has many fixed sentences for a specific crime. However, under many contexts it has showed many faulty evaluations and the solution is to put the power to a fair judge.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 265, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...what he did under the court, from thieve , robber to murder and nation betrayer ar...
^^
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ns he decides the crime’s fate. This is a biggest hold in Vietnam law because if ...
^
Line 3, column 485, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...nations, the power belongs to 12 juries who are 12 different people in the society from...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 978, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...nt is that the power has to be given to a appropriate holder. In conclusion, the...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, so, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, kind of, first of all, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1822.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 390.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67179487179 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5757840674 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546153846154 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6736085416 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.176470588 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9411764706 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58823529412 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259622930112 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0887624729465 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667547231458 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175030732339 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0878903704458 0.056905535591 154% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 50.2224549098 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.