It is believed that a specific kind of crime should be dealt with a particular sentence. However, some people argue that the law has to be flexible under many cases and the original reasons for committing a crime when reconsidering to accuse a guilty individual. In my opinion, both statements greatly convinced me for some reasons.
First of all, the law works quite strictly and fairly because the law system has been developing for many centuries, and it keeps fixing the rule when acknowledging a hole in the system. Most of the time, crime are treated fairly for what they did under the court, from thieve, robbers to murder, and nation betrayers are sentenced to months, years, decades, or death. For example, the new law of Vietnam has just been enforced to ban driving after drinking alcohol because drunk drivers mainly cause car accidents. According to that, Drivers’ licenses will be revoked for 10 to 12 months and fined for a fixed amount of money which is enough for him not to drink when he is in traffic.
However, when it comes to Vietnam’s Law, there are some differences from other Western nations. In Vietnam, the man who holds all power under the court is the tribunal president, which decides the crime’s fate. This is the most significant hold in Vietnam law because if the holder is a dedicated and fair person, he can assess the circumstances correctly. However, if he is a corrupted judge, the consequences would be unfair. In contrast, in western nations, the power belongs to 12 juries who are 12 different people in the society from the lowest class to the higher ones. The court would be much fairer because 12 juries cannot be chosen in advance so that they can judge a situation most accurately. For instance, there were many precedents in Vietnam law that pushed two adolescents to jail for three years because of bread stealing, and a man was kicked into prison because he stole a duck from his neighbor. Hence, the critical point is that the power must be given to an appropriate holder.
In conclusion, the law has many fixed sentences for a specific crime. However, it has shown many faulty evaluations under many contexts, and the solution is to put the power to a fair judge.
- Some peope think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent else whereTo what extent do you agree with this view 61
- The purpose of businesses is to make money and they should concentrate only on this Do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country Others say that these are no the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language Discuss both views and give your own opini 61
- Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give 78
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 492, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...nations, the power belongs to 12 juries who are 12 different people in the society from...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, so, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, kind of, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1838.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 386.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76165803109 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59589111906 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549222797927 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0282230968 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.117647059 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7058823529 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58823529412 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26946648509 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0908194501786 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673433431441 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177981592708 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0886431107699 0.056905535591 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.