Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime and the motivation for committing it should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Crimes have always been a haunting for humanity since time immemorial. Criminologists concur on the fact that the penalty awarded for every crime committed must be equal. However, there are some who argue that the conditions of an individual crime and the inspiration behind the conduct of such an act should be taken into account when deciding on the punishment for the offence. This essay discusses both views and arrives at an opinion.
Proponents of one-punishment-for-all say that same punishment should be levied on all offenders disregarding the causes behind it. If at all such a norm come into being implemented, then there would be a drastic decrease in the number of criminal activities. For example, if beheading is the punishment to be awarded to the wrongdoers then the country would be devoid of crime. Hence, same punishment for all categories of crime can bring down criminal activities.
However, there are some legal authorities who argue that a thorough investigation should be conducted before deciding on the punishment. A crime may be done not based on intention but based on human instinct for self-defence. For example, when a man attempts to harras a woman, on impulse the woman might jab a knife at him to protect herself. In this regard, all crimes must be thoroughly studied and then levy the punishment.
In conclusion, although supporters of single punishment for all sorts of crime are strong in that stance, at the same time the background history of the crime must be looked into. Hence, I support the need for an absolute investigation to thoroughly comprehend the motive behind a crime.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-22 | mary.ssherr | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Turonxoja | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | olParya | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | tkngan213 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | khanhptk162 | 61 | view |
- Telecommuting is changing the concept of conventional working atmosphere Do you agree 65
- We are becoming increasingly dependent on computers. They are used in business, hospitals, crime detection and even to fly planes. In which more fields will they be used in future? In this dependence on computers salutary or should be more cautious about 78
- Levels of depression and antisocial behaviour in children have increased dramatically in modern societies This situations has led many people to infer that childhood itself is in Crisis To what extent do you agree or disagree with the latter statement 56
- Today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertisement and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold. To what extent do you agree? 56
- In recent years, there has been growing interest in the relationship between equality and personal achievement. Some people believe that individuals can achieve more in egalitarian societies. Others believe that high levels of personal achievement are 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Crimes have always been a haunting for h...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... both views and arrives at an opinion. Proponents of one-punishment-for-all say...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...me can bring down criminal activities. However, there are some legal authoritie...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... studied and then levy the punishment. In conclusion, although supporters of si...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, look, may, regarding, so, then, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05204460967 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04481164592 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527881040892 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4197712747 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0714285714 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2142857143 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.478025570062 0.244688304435 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174021849801 0.084324248473 206% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104991102645 0.0667982634062 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.31215254262 0.151304729494 206% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.091422545905 0.056905535591 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.