Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behaviour. Others disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences.
Nowadays, traveling abroad is a new and modern trend in the world that is familiar with many traveling-lovers. As there are a lot of differences between visitors and local residents about customs together with culture, some people think that visitors should get used to local countries while others support that it is the local countries that should welcome the differences. In my opinion, I agree that the combination between the two would be better.
On the one hand, integrating with local people is the crucial principle that every traveler should keep in mind. Firstly, following the local customs means showing a respectful attitude to the host country. Local people would be more enthusiastic to introduce their age-old culture if they find that visitors are interested in and willing to hear. Secondly, trying to be a part of local inhabitants will help to learn a lot of priceless knowledge that couldn't be found in any books or materials. For example, coming to Vietnam, visitors will not only see or eat Banh Chung but also be informed of what it contains and how to make it and even the valuable experience about how to make a delicious and nice one.
On the other hand, the host country should be hospitable by accepting the differences of other cultures and help visitor to fall in line with local traditions. Welcoming cultural differences is a good way to create comfortable and friendly atmosphere which allow visitors to ask about the native customs freely without hesitation. Besides, with an open-minded attitude, local people can learn about many interesting features of customs from foreign visitors. That would be a treasure opportunity to exchange the traditions between the two and make the relationship closer and tighter.
In conclusion, the effort to approve of the cultural differences must result from the both sides: the local residents and the foreign travellers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-21 | YGGGG | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | huythinhtran95 | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-19 | khanhptk162 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-22 | Username Username Username | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-22 | Username Username Username | 61 | view |
- The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000, and the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years. 67
- Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behaviour. Others disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences. 73
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of the silkworm and the stages in the production of silk cloth. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 453, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...learn a lot of priceless knowledge that couldnt be found in any books or materials. For...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12540192926 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83334301347 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553054662379 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9575749396 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.615384615 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9230769231 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3846153846 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358334140628 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118052238734 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.149297987762 0.0667982634062 224% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211132890448 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117623497832 0.056905535591 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.