Some people believe that we should invent a new language for international communication. To what extent do you agree/disagree
Globalization in today's contemporary world has made people think about inventing a new medium of communication globally. I totally agree as the invention of a novel language will not only ease the way of interaction but also boost trade.
It is undeniable that a single language that can be employed for all global communications will result in having more clarity about the other person's view. In other words, this single mode of communication would not impede the understanding of capabilities or interpretation of the content. Consequently, better people to people interaction among many nations which may reflect in the ties between the nations.
Another significant point to consider is that it may boost trade. This is to say that, many entrepreneurs would find it more convenient if such a development take place, as they may find it easier to communicate with traders around the world. Eventually, the business might flourish like never before. In addition to this, the current economic slowdown can also be overcome by an innovative idea like this which may create myriad of job opportunities around the world because of an increase in trade among countries.
However, some people consider that such a novel idea cannot be implemented practically, as it may take a lot of time for everyone to learn the basics of the language which is a daunting task. Nevertheless, humans are the most intelligent animal on this planet and with the will power to earn more this should not be an issue.
In conclusion, discovering a novice language just for global interaction will reap many benefits which range from ameliorating the bonding among different nations to bolstering the
trade sector. Overall, it seems to me that this will result as a driving force to the world economy as long as people learn the language structures.
- Many men and women are making the decision to have children later in life Why is this trend occurring What are the impacts of this development on both family and society 89
- Why is the number of bikes increasing What can be down 89
- Space exploration 73
- A lot of money is spent on old buildings Instead they should be demolished and new buildings should be erected To what extend do you agree 78
- Personal statment 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, in addition, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11295681063 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9722691208 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558139534884 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2469881962 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.384615385 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1538461538 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157364340978 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581873473917 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479273226249 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0906762220708 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568792171073 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.