: Some people believe that women should play an equal role as men in a country’s police force or military force, while others think women are not suitable for these kinds of jobs. Discuss both views and give your opinion
Gender equality has been a heated debate in past few decades when advocates claim for woman’s rights in choosing a career in the police or the armed forces. There are value arguments on both sides which I will discuss now.
On the one hand, there is no reason why females are not selected for a position in politics or the military. Firstly, in the modern world, women have the right to pursue any career which they are interested in, no matter they like being a politician or a soldier. With the multi-tasking mindset, the fair sex has proven they are the best at any jobs assigned to them. Theresa May, for example, the commendable Prime Minister of England, also named as the Steel Woman, shows to the world that she has been doing the great job to lead a European prosperous country. Secondly, the desk jobs in the states are more suitable for women than men because women are more patient and meticulous. These character traits are undeniable and ones of women’s potentials.
However, some believe having a job in the political and military field is not for females for some certain extents. It is a common sense to admit that these jobs require endurance and physical strengths, which fit the man’s condition. Long hours of training or being sent abroad to a real battle is a part of the job’s requirements, and males are likely to be more suitable. Moreover, people argue that women tend to be more emotional and less decisive than men, therefore, the results could be misled. A wrong decision, especially in politics, is real threat not only for the country itself but also for the citizen’s life. As the result, it affects the selection for a job in a police department or military force.
In conclusion, although women are free to choose a job they want, I am in favor of the idea that desk jobs are more suitable for women if they like to work for government in politics or military force.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-28 | titphan | 89 | view |
| 2019-08-24 | kimmy3 | 78 | view |
| 2019-01-27 | baonguyennhu | 61 | view |
| 2019-01-27 | quanganh3110 | 78 | view |
- The graph shows the percentage of overweight men and women in Australia between 1980 and 2010 80
- The chart below show different types of transport go to and from work in 1960, 1980, 2000. 56
- the charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to Park Hotel how they rated the hotel's customer service with 100 guests in 2005 and 2010. 61
- the graph shows the tourists came to Malaysia and Dubai from 1995 to 2003. 73
- The charts below show reasons for travel and the main issues for the travelling public in the US in 2009. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1599.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73076923077 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61899166242 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565088757396 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7327444006 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.6 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5333333333 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240374089073 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834955378244 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055196287588 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148526006295 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302337754332 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.