From the decade, scientist prefers animals for their research. Some schools of thought advocate the usage of flora for therapeutically purpose which is beneficial for masses, whereas others are skeptic. This essay shades light on both the relevant arguments of my inclination and I give my opinion in conclusion.
To embark, however, skeptic’s belief, there are myriad of reasons behind the animal experimentation for medical purposes. The first and prominent reason, the animal’s body gave same response as folk and makes the experiment fruitful. Secondly, it should be dangerous, if the medical drug serve without research.it would show in general survey the animal which used for the experiment, in that Dog is paragon. Last but not the least; it is general observation that the yesteryear’s scientist involves Mouse for research and save human life.
On the other hand, there are some prominent reasons to save animals. First and foremost they are equally valuable as human being. Secondly, because of paramount usage of animals Eco-system affects drastically. Last but not the least, to halt the circumstances government has to find out the alternatives, and use the breakthrough of technologies.
In the close scrutiny, as the animals are useful for earth’s Eco-system I opine that the government should have found out some alternatives and save them.
- There are social, medical, and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones.What forms do they take?Do you agree the problems of mobile phones outweigh the benefits? 84
- Some people claim that it is acceptable to use animals in medical research for the benefit of human beings, while other people argue that it is wrong. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'circumstances'' or 'circumstance's'?
Suggestion: circumstances'; circumstance's
...ly. Last but not the least, to halt the circumstances government has to find out the alternat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 8, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'scrutiny'.
Suggestion: scrutiny
...breakthrough of technologies. In the close scrutiny, as the animals are useful for earth&ap...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, whereas, as to, in conclusion, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 41.998997996 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1175.0 1615.20841683 73% => OK
No of words: 214.0 315.596192385 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49065420561 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13579256949 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 176.041082164 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616822429907 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 367.2 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8633927118 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9166666667 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8333333333 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.91666666667 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227913647322 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785275306524 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0339335014085 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131912472692 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352447394275 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.