Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
Recently, the phenomenon of waste recycling and its corresponding impacts have sparked a long-running dispute all around the globe. In this regard, apart from the necessity to decline industrial wastes, a proportion of the world’s population are of the opinion that more practical laws which must applied by governments are needed to force households recycling more wastes. In my mind, laws can have remarkable benefits on this matter.
Obviously, the majority of societies tend to obey the laws rather than breaking them. To rise the amount of waste which could be recycled, authorities should legislate useful rules to separate wastes at the site of people’s houses, and so the recycling process can become relatively efficient and far easier.
Furthermore, by applying taxes to the houses’ rubbish, governments can push families to walk in the right path, that is not only making them to create less wastes but also, they struggle with recycling more wastes as mush as they can. These tax policies even have the opportunity to take greenhouse gas emissions into account.
On the other hand, we shouldn’t lose sight of incentives. It is likely that, as virtually all aspects of human concerns, money play the most significant roles as a motivator. For instance, people can receive back a proportion of their total purchase, through delivering a certain number of plastic bottles or package cartons. Furthermore, families will be encouraged to produce less litter or recycle more wastes if governments discount their energy bills regarding their wastes.
To sum up, despite compelling arguments on necessities of wastes recycling, I am inclined to believe laws alongside motivations as cogs of recycling machine will work smoother. Imagine, you are fined due to a can!
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-29 | nobitaa | 84 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
- The chart below shows the amount of spent on six consumer goods in four European countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 89
- Scientists believe that the increasing average temperature is an issue What caused global warming and present solution to reduce its effect 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 88, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... its corresponding impacts have sparked a long-running dispute all around the globe. In this r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 152, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun wastes is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... that is not only making them to create less wastes but also, they struggle with rec...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, regarding, so, apart from, for instance, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3038869258 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87894151756 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.671378091873 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.7251715675 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.461538462 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7692307692 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313458872903 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852550164765 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748557609446 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156594887681 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0238445560403 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.