Due to the ever-increasing population, most of the states have faced in trash disposal and recycling problems. personally, I advocate the opinion that in order to moderate the waste problem and increase the recycling issue, the government should legislate law in which citizens and industries manage their waste to recycle these.
The main reason why a legal requirement about recycling is considered a positive development is that it makes to abide by the companies and citizens a determined rule. Take a company as an example, Since the packing of products plays a pivotal role in increasing the waste not only by the company but also by consumers, it is a considerably rich perspective to force the firm used the recyclable and degradable raw materials in which would be eliminated the problems of non-degradable plastics that would remain intact for millennia. The law would be kept health our environment and as a whole our planet, the Earth. This is also a considerable case that governments legislate to limit the energy use for industries and firms be forced to recycle their waste to the energy generation. These are a couple of ways in which display the positive trends of legislation in recycling waste.
Another rational justification about needed law for recycling is that governments should legislate some laws to contract with recycling firms for industries and hold indirect supervision on their performance via related councils. The benefit accruing of contracting with relevant companies is mutual for the government and the industries. Not only do industries manage their waste, which is a perennial problem, to generate energy or raw materials but also leads to the development of the recycling industry in the nations and makes it a lot of job opportunities for youth. That is why legislation about recycling positively taken as a whole.
To sum up, considering the point discussed above, the most reasonable conclusion to be drawn is that basic measures for recycling issue have to be held by governments throughout the legislation and these laws are necessary for continuing survival of nature. This is mainly because there would be serious repercussions involved and government laws like this can easily prohibit to take their toll on nature as well as the vulnerable ecosystem.
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 65
- The old tradition of a family having a meal together is disappearing. Why do you think is this happening? How does it affect individuals and the community? 78
- History tells that people have often thought about creating an ideal society but most of the times fail in making this happen What is your opinion about an ideal society How can we create an ideal society 77
- Some people think competitive sports, such as football, are valuable because they can gather people with different ages and cultures together. Some think competitive sports can cause problems because people are from different groups and countries. Discuss 84
- Some people think young people should be free to choose their job while others believe that they should be realistic and think about their future Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 112, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Personally
... trash disposal and recycling problems. personally, I advocate the opinion that in order t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1942.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22043010753 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05045822949 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508064516129 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 626.4 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.3392341119 49.4020404114 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.384615385 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6153846154 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.53846153846 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274677695521 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103541368837 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575567080812 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180323384423 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504805381641 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.59 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.