Some people feel that the design of newly constructed buildings in big cities should be controlled by governments. Others believe those who finance the construction of a building should be free to design it as they see fit.
In constructing a building in a big city, some people believe that governments should control it, while others prefer to construct the building, freely in design, based on the patron will. In this essay, I will discuss their rational backgrounds and later I will share my own opinion.
It is commonly known that the government of a city has a strategic plan in developing the city. The strategy must be divided into sort, medium and long term strategies. In the long term strategy, it is possible for the government to plan a beautiful city with good shape and neat. It is something that cannot be reached if there is no standardization to construct a building. By authority of the government, it is possible for the government to make a standard building, especially in their appearances, colour, and height of the building. City in Italia, in my opinion, is a good example of a city which has a good plan to develop a city.
On the other hand, people who argue that the design of a building should base on the patron will usually because they do not want to limit their imagination. Furthermore, a building that has to follow the government standard will be lost a uniqueness of the building. In addition, the patron of a building usually has a different budget that they allocated to construct a building. Therefore it is hard for them to construct a standard appearance building.
To sum up, the government who want to make standardization in a building has a futuristic plan not only for the building but also for the city. Therefore, in my opinion, it is good for the private sector to follow the rule. If the patron cannot follow the rule due to the financial condition, I think the government should give any subsidise to them particularly in supporting the building appearances.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-03 | hasanadjieb | 61 | view |
| 2019-04-25 | sabithmohammad | 56 | view |
| 2019-04-25 | vinusharma27 | 73 | view |
| 2019-03-28 | lordwind | 61 | view |
| 2019-03-07 | LY | 73 | view |
- In the past most families ate together in the evening, and the food was almost always cooked at home. Nowadays, however, many families rarely eat together every day and often the food is bought outside the house, or supplied by catering.What are the reaso 61
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.Leisure time in a typical week in hour- by sex and employment status, 84
- The position of women has changed a great deal in many societies over the past 50 years But these societies cannot claim to have achieved gender equality To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think that there should be strict laws to control the amount of noise a person makes because of the disturbance it causes to people. 61
- The chart below shows the different types of goods and services purchased online in Australia Canada and the United Kingdom in one year 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 383, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...they allocated to construct a building. Therefore it is hard for them to construct a stan...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, therefore, while, as to, i think, in addition, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7845659164 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97032674211 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.450160771704 0.561755894193 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8727541689 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.13333333333 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274630253883 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0956454242974 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101238572038 0.0667982634062 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183284933098 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0871440195069 0.056905535591 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.