Some people feel that entertainers such as film stars, pop musicians or sports stars are paid too much money.
Do you agree or disagree?
Which other types of job should be highly paid?
Although most of the people think that celebrity stars, rock star musician and sportsperson are the best entertainers in the world. However, they are getting huge monetary rewards for the kind of work that they are doing in their particular field but not all of them only who are in form. Firstly, in this essay reason for why they are getting highly paid and secondly, apart from performers who else getting highly advantages.
On the one hand, today people are following celebrities like in NEWS or through social media. Internet brings so much fame and money to the entertainers because when they clicked on their field and they will get advertisements apart from their own work, so they are also earning side money most likely to be double money. Those who do ads, mostly they are film stars or sports person apart from them we see models in ads where they will get less paid than performers. For instances, Virat kohili is one of the current greatest cricketers and in football like MESSI or Ronaldo for them, social media is enough to earn if they post a photo or video in Instagram and they get paid for that also rather than ads and their salary.
On the other hand, despite performers are earning so much money, however, they are getting paid by the business people itself like Nike or Puma companies. Through the performers, they are earning more money than them. For example, Virat Kohli is the ambassador of Puma, if he is representing a product obviously there followers would like to try that product, due to this their business clicks and they will earning enormously.
In conclusion, I would like to agree that performers are getting more money in some other way rather than their jobs, but those who paid money to those performers and they will earn so much money in future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-04 | Pinki_ | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-21 | kalkipriya Muruganantham | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-21 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-21 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | NeutronnzZ | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- In recent years, the family structure has changed, as well as family roles. What are the changes occurring? Do you think these changes are positive or negative? 61
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007. 67
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 409, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'earn'
Suggestion: earn
...his their business clicks and they will earning enormously. In conclusion, I woul...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 197, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ormers and they will earn so much money in future.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, apart from, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77388535032 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38109456832 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506369426752 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.66175891 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.272727273 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5454545455 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.9090909091 7.06120827912 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169776813765 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079938082789 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572145715496 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124083909944 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287115215699 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 11.3001002004 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.