In recent decades, besides traditional extended families, there also have been many nuclear families. While some people seem to support the idea that it is more convenient for people to live in large family groups, I would argue that living in small family units is the better choice.
On one hand, the traditional extended family is one of the most common family styles, especially in Asia countries. First, this is due to the fact that people used to believe that when living in a large family group, family members can make a close-knit relationship with each other. Thus, when someone had some troubles, family members can help each other easily. Second, in Asian culture, the first thing children need to learn is how to pay respect to elderly people. When living with their grandparents, they will improve their personalities and skill sets by becoming more responsible.
On the other hand, I think living in a small family unit is the better way nowadays. In extended families, there are about three or four generations living together under the same roof. Therefore, a generation gap can happen frequently since the lack of communication between family members of different ages. In addition, today the nuclear family style with two generations become more popular for several reasons. In the nuclear family style, children's mental and physical health can be taken care of more carefully by their mom and dad. Sharing financial burden problem is the other reason why nuclear families became more common. While in the past, in extended families, men was a breadwinner and women stayed at home solely, in small family units wives can share financial problems with their husbands by doing jobs.
In conclusion, while some people said that extended family is the better family style, I believe that this kind of family is more likely to have a harmful impact
- Students perform better in school when they are rewarded rather than punished To what extend do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when they are used as money making attractions Others believe it is the only way to save these traditions Discuss both sides and give your opinion 73
- The diagram below shows how orange juice is produced Summarize the important information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some people prefer to live in small family units while others think it is better to live in large family groups Discuss both of views and give your opinion 73
- The diagram shows the process of either recycling plastic items to produce goods or trash into dust bins to fill land 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, if, second, so, therefore, thus, while, i think, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01935483871 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49515659862 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558064516129 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6333168153 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.733333333 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383270098424 0.244688304435 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140088358402 0.084324248473 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134657068105 0.0667982634062 202% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265896833739 0.151304729494 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411131344405 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.