Some people prefer to live in small family units, while others think it is better to live in large family groups. Discuss both of views and give your opinion.
People have different views about which the types of family they like to live in. While there are some advantages of living in a nuclear family, I would argue that it is better for people live in multiple generations family.
On the one hand, there are several benefits of living as a nuclear family. Firstly, since the members of nuclear family tend to have fewer children than large family groups, children are more closer to their parents and they can have more free and frank discussion about their problems with parents. For example, parents can give some advice to choose the best school when their children are confused and worry. As a result, educating children is easier and more effective which helps for the better development of their personalities. Secondly, because the parents can get time to plan and manage their children independently without the interference of elders, parents in nuclear household are more likely to have a higher consistency in raising their children such as teaching discipline and strict attitude when needed. Therefore, children achieve good results as expected by parents easily. If living in a large family, children might be embarrassed by a lot of opinions from their parents, grandparents and each other who live with.
On the other hand, i believe that it is propitious for people to live in extended family. First, due to the popularity of both parents working and earning money, the willing of healthy grandparents helps to take care of young grandchildren during the day. This encourages grandparents and children to spend time together and add value to each other's lives. For instance, the grandparents may not become lonely and isolated when they live alone and children can learn about caring for their elders. Without helping from elders, the bonds between grandparents and grandchildren might be loose and parents can consume a significant amount on childcare costs. Additionally, the need to cultivate and carry on family culture and traditions throughout different generations is often very important to families, such as expat families. Therefore, in an extended family, members can work together to expose their children and grandchildren to some aspects they would experience in their home country, such as language, foods and traditions. But this is not only true for expat families, many non-expat families also find that their children have the opportunity to learn different values and gain a greater understanding of tradition when they live with multiple generations of their family.
To sum up, while living in a nuclear family has some benefits for people to some extent, I believe choosing to live in extended family is a better opinion.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-05-14 | trilee66 | 73 | view |
2019-06-15 | anhvu010197@gmail.com | 73 | view |
2019-09-03 | Gowridevaraj | 73 | view |
- Some people think they have the right to use as much fresh water as they want, while others believe that government should control the use of fresh water as it is limited resources. Discuss both views and give your own opinions. 73
- Some people think that the development of technology has made our life more complex and the solution is to live a simpler life without that technology To what extent do you agree or disagree 75
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- It is expected that there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries in the future Do you think it is a positive or negative development 82
- Nowadays most people learn academic study in university but others think we should encourage to learn vocational skills more do you agree of disagree 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 206, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'generations'' or 'generation's'?
Suggestion: generations'; generation's
...t is better for people live in multiple generations family. On the one hand, there are...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e live in multiple generations family. On the one hand, there are several benef...
^^^^
Line 2, column 191, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'closer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: closer
... than large family groups, children are more closer to their parents and they can have more...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dparents and each other who live with. On the other hand, i believe that it is ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 24, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... who live with. On the other hand, i believe that it is propitious for peopl...
^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... multiple generations of their family. To sum up, while living in a nuclear fam...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2271.0 1615.20841683 141% => OK
No of words: 439.0 315.596192385 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17312072893 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74290896444 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473804100228 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 712.8 506.74238477 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3029468591 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.166666667 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3888888889 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248882016192 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0957579162462 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102622630274 0.0667982634062 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23805473535 0.151304729494 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120425216899 0.056905535591 212% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.