Some people prefer to work on school projects with a group, while others would rather work alone.
Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
There is no doubt that modern schools, colleges or universities are fascinated to encourage students in preparing as many projects and assignments as possible. Projects enhance the overall value of the students that might be utilized in practical or professional works in later of their lives. It's often argued that working in a team generates more value for students or accomplishing projects alone. However, while working in a group enhances communication skills and practical learning, I personally opine that working alone is more beneficial for students because of building self-confidence and avoiding conflicts.
On one hand, working in a group would be beneficial to develop communication skills and to accelerate practical learning. First of all, while collaborating in a team, students get the opportunities to interact with other children because they share not only study related tasks but also personal feelings. Moreover, when students work together especially in a peer group, they learn how to behave with other people and how to deal with critical circumstances. For instance, a study of University of Durham showed that 81.41% of the students who worked in a team in 2016 could easily solve puzzles. Another aspect could be improving practical learning because students apply group learning in their practical lives. Additionally, collaborating in a group reduces the chance of committing mistakes as students jointly produce ideas, discuss and reconcile if they find any sub-standard ideas.
On the other hand, working alone could be proved effective because it builds confidence among students and avoid conflicts among group members. Firstly, when students work without collaborating with anyone, they manage everything by their own and deal with critical sections of the projects such as generating results and explaining the results, building self-confidence of dealing with tough circumstances. For example, Dr. Orinton Ganguly, a professor of Koda College found that students who worked alone in their projects in summer 2010 presented effectively in front of the audience. Furthermore, students working alone can minimize conflict among other students by less interactions and disputes.
However, I think that working in team is unlikely to contribute increasing the value of students as few students likely to work in a group, resulting low individual performances, but overall high performance of the group. Finally, because all members don't work in a team equally, they can not build the sense of responsibility in them.
To conclude, both working in a team and performing alone might be beneficial for students while completing projects; however, I believe that working alone is more effective because it reduces conflict and boosts self-confidence.
- Social media has many positive uses, but there have been some negative consequences to it as well. Identify a problem caused by social media and describe the solutions you would propose to address this problem. 89
- Some people believe that violence on television and in computer games has a damaging effect on the society. Others deny that these factors have any significant influence on people's behavior. What is your opinion? 61
- Some students work while studying. This often results in lacking time for education and constantly feeling under pressure.What do you think are the causes of this?What solutions can you suggest? 67
- Many people have difficulty maintaining a healthy diet What are the causes of this problem How could it be solved 64
- In many developing countries, there is a problem with declining quality of air and water from both industry and construction. What measures could be taken to prevent this? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 620, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...self-confidence and avoiding conflicts. On one hand, working in a group would be...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 671, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun interactions is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...nimize conflict among other students by less interactions and disputes. However...
^^^^
Line 5, column 703, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ents by less interactions and disputes. However, I think that working in team is...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 252, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...the group. Finally, because all members dont work in a team equally, they can not bu...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, i think, no doubt, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2367.0 1615.20841683 147% => OK
No of words: 425.0 315.596192385 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56941176471 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07545163645 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503529411765 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 725.4 506.74238477 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.7535144338 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.235294118 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.94117647059 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273014291901 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10648143893 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504530691406 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178670885572 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0204561364531 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.