Some people said that giving aid to poorer countries has more negative effects than positive effects, to what extend do you agree or disagree ?
In the last decade, the international aids for the developing countries play an important role in those economies. From my point of view, I totally disagree with that it brings drawbacks more than advantages.
On the one hand, there are a variety of negative effects toward low-level nations through developed countries’ supports. Firstly, in terms of financial aid, it may make poorer countries are more and more dependent on developed countries. When Government receives the financial support, they easily use it into inefficient purposes until those funds are exhausted, they will need the further aid. Secondly, the foreign aid will be meaningless, if it goes into the corrupt hands and not reach those for whom it was meant for. For instance, the corrupt government will not spend that money for investing the meaningful projects or helping poor people, because they only think concerning their benefits.
On the other hand, the advantages of the rich countries supporting the poorer are obvious. One reason is that the poorer nations will gain the positive changes in regard to not only infrastructure but also scientific and technological level. To be specific, the construction of schools and hospitals which involve local people will help them to have a better life. In addition, the low-level countries have countless opportunities to obtain the international projects in many fields, particularly in education. Take many students in Asia who had the good academic achievements as an example, thanks to the global scholarship from the rich nations, they reached the golden chances to study abroad, and then they will come back to their countries to apply this sort of knowledge to enrich those countries.
In conclusion, I do not believe that the developed nations receive aids from developing countries will gain more negative issues compared to positive issues.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-09-18 | JuliaThe | 56 | view |
2019-08-24 | Gurdarshan Kaur | 95 | view |
- The table below shows the number of students living in the UK gaining English language teacher training qualifications in 2007/8 and 2008/9, and the proportion of male qualifiers.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and 73
- Nowadays, subjects and lesson contents should be decided by the authorities such as Government. Many people suggest that teachers should make the choice. Discuss both view and give your own opinion? 84
- Today fewer elderly people live with their children than in the past Do u think this is a positive or a negative development 87
- Some people think it is important for all children to learn history in school Others believe that other subjects are more relevant to children s lives today Discuss both views and give your own opinion 74
- Some people claim that it is acceptable to use animals in medical research for the benefit of human beings while other people argue that it is wrong Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, sort of, in regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32214765101 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89643000744 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597315436242 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2784624751 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2307692308 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186508038724 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720006111894 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572812671051 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128103623924 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363660672707 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.