Some people say that art subjects such as music, drama and creative writing are an essential part of education, and every school should include them in its syllabus. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
The question regarding school education and what it should comprise has always been highly debatable. It is argued that dramatic art, music lessons and creative writing ought to be part of schoolchildren tuition plan due to their paramount importance. I completely disagree with this statement and believe that the above-mentioned subjects are not comprehensively beneficial to children.
First of all, the listed subjects require a degree of creativity, which the majority of people lack. This means that unlike mathematics and biology, art subjects should not be indispensible part of a school program since a few pupils are capable to relate themselves to them. Therefore, including such unpopular disciplines would not be advisable for academic schools. For example, in Russia the government opted to attempt such a policy with religious education which happened to be a disaster among students and their parents. In other words, schools have to serve as a tool to educate and supply humans with applicable knowledge and they should not hold any prerequisites.
Secondly, in current time most individuals are fascinated by advances in technology. Proceeding from this, due to computerization, an abundance of youngsters prefer to select physics and mathematics over art disciplines. Hence, the latter carry no applicable value and provoke little interest in young people. For instance, according to the Word’s Bureau of Statistics the most high-paying jobs are among one connected to Internet Technology (IT). Thus, the pupils’ incentives and desires to obtain a lucrative occupation in their future are explicitly clear.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that art subjects possess and adverse effect on the young owing to their impractical nature and high initial requirements in terms of talent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-28 | gur1040894 | 79 | view |
| 2021-05-28 | gur1040894 | 73 | view |
- Some people advocate death penalty for those who committed violent crimes Others say that death penalty is unacceptable in contemporary society Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- Some people advocate death penalty for those who committed violent crimes Others say that capital punishment is unacceptable in contemporary society Describe advantages and disadvantages of death penalty and give your opinion 67
- Scientists believe that the world is in danger due to environmental changes Some people say that personal lifestyle changes should be made to reduce the damage to environment while others think that the government should do something to help Discuss both 50
- Throughout history male leaders have led us into violence and conflict If a society is governed by female leaders it will be more peaceful Do you agree or disagree 78
- Fossil fuels are the main source of energy around the world However people are being encouraged to use alternative energy sources such as wind energy solar energy and so on Why people become more enthusiastic about this Is it a positive or negative develo 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 677, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...they should not hold any prerequisites. Secondly, in current time most individua...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5559566787 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10771828104 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653429602888 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2358079375 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.928571429 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7857142857 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26712164013 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723629607232 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551957441973 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138160562838 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.089970546422 0.056905535591 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.22 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 677, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...they should not hold any prerequisites. Secondly, in current time most individua...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5559566787 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10771828104 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653429602888 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2358079375 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.928571429 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7857142857 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26712164013 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723629607232 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551957441973 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138160562838 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.089970546422 0.056905535591 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.22 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.