Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
While some people believe that the optimal measure to boost public health is by expanding the number of sports amenities, others say that this would have little bearing on public health, thus other methods are needed. From my perspective, I believe that the second view is more prudent.
On the one hand, erecting more sports centers offers more chances to people to improve their health. These places allow people to have access to myriads facilities to do exercises. In rural areas, people seem to struggle when they work out due to the lack of proper facilities whereas, in cities, where gyms or yoga clubs are abundant, citizens can easily go to these destinations on a daily basis to use treadmills or do yoga, thus being healthier day by day. In addition, sports centers would be ideal rendezvous for meeting and socializing. Because people can communicate with their friends and families in such places, they may consider working out as a method of alleviating stress and expanding their social circles; therefore, they can not only improve their physical health but also their mental one.
However, I would argue that there are other factors determining whether the public could be healthy besides going to sports centers. First, having a diet with wholesome food plays an indispensable role in boosting citizens' health. No matter how much time a person dedicates to working out, if this individual keeps having fast food regularly, he or she will be highly likely to suffer from obesity, heart attack, and other diseases. Second, to be healthy demands for good lifestyles. Those who lead a sedentary lifestyle or usually stay up late would be prone to serious diseases although they do go to the gyms or yoga centers. Therefore, expanding sports centers would be futile if people have unhealthy lifestyles and diets, which means increasing the number of sports centers would have marginal impacts on public health.
In conclusion, although expanding sports facilities would be beneficial for people to a certain extent, I would contend that this would not be the most effective way to boost the health of the citizens and other measures would be more efficient in boosting public health.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-25 | MinyiChu | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | Ediyorbek521 | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-02 | lydia231232 | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-02 | lydia231232 | 89 | view |
| 2022-11-24 | Alili | 67 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the hours per week that teenagers spend doing certain activities in Chester from 2002 to 2007 73
- To meet the growing needs of food for the increasing population country should make use of edible insects as foods However some people believe that insects are not only unhealthy but also affect negatively the nature too What are the benefits and drawback 56
- The pie charts compare ways of accessing the news in Canada and Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- Some say that rich countries should help poor countries with trade health and education Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your experience 73
- Big salary is more important than job satisfaction To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, thus, whereas, while, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1843.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07713498623 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5374846908 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564738292011 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.9582567527 49.4020404114 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.642857143 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9285714286 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361412584008 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122791346158 0.084324248473 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128922612442 0.0667982634062 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260830146558 0.151304729494 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111983946226 0.056905535591 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.