Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion
It is sometimes argued that the most suitable way to strengthen people's health is by building more sports' infrastructure. While this thinking is valid to a certain extent, I think this only has an insignificant impact on public health, and, therefore, more effective methods can be applied.
On the one hand, there are some compelling reasons why the deterioration of our health can be overcome due to the erection of sporting centres. The main reason is that sports facilities provide a more suitable method of exercising. As a result, this helps people strengthen muscles and avoid getting unexpected accidents while practising by themselves. Furthermore, the widespread of sports care raises people's awareness of their health. People usually want to exercise in a place with modern equipment and tend to invite their relations to avoid being bored, which plays a vital role in improving the community's health.
However, other justifiable measures to improve social health should be applied. Firstly, the government needs to implement a policy that attending working out while studying at school or working in the office is a compulsory part of every people's schedule. As a result, this new regulation saves a vast amount of time seeking gym clubs or training courses and reduces the budget for opening more sports services. Secondly, in addition to exercising regularly, people also need to have a well-balanced diet. For instance, the Japanese, famous for strict eating habits, have a lower rate of obesity and other dangerous diseases than others despite their lack of time for working out due to their busy working's timetable.
In conclusion, while some maintain that the most effective way to increase the community's health is geared to construct sporting centres. I firmly believe that it is better to take others compelling methods.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-25 | MinyiChu | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | Ediyorbek521 | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-02 | lydia231232 | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-02 | lydia231232 | 89 | view |
| 2022-11-24 | Alili | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Is this a positive or negative development 84
- Too much emphasis is placed on testing these days The need to prepare for tests and examinations is a restriction on teachers and also exerts unnecessary pressure on young learners How far do you agree or disagree with this view 89
- Too much emphasis is placed on testing these days The need to prepare for tests and examinations is a restriction on teachers and also exerts unnecessary pressure on young learners How far do you agree or disagree with this view 89
- Too much emphasis is placed on testing these days The need to prepare for tests and examinations is a restriction on teachers and also exerts unnecessary pressure on young learners How far do you agree or disagree with this view 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, while, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27457627119 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83373205254 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606779661017 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6808875642 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.142857143 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0714285714 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5714285714 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265441802504 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0899166205488 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050137130174 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163729086885 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0229761633777 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.