Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In modern society, community health has played an important role in the world’s health development, and increasing the number of sports equipment is one of those popular methods. Some people argue that this method is the best choice while others say its effect is limited and we should need more measures to maintain our health. In my opinion, the combination of several methods will bring potential results.
On the one hand, improving public health by establishing more sports centers and facilities where people can join and work out after work is the optimal measure, according to some opinions. The benefit of this method is obvious when more and more people attend gym classes in their free time. In the sports center, there are many subjects suitable for individuals, such as running, lifting, squash, and so on. Besides, it is also a place where people can reduce stress by making friends and chatting with each other.
On the other hand, some others support the idea that more measures should be required because of the limitation of that method since neither everyone can access the sports facilities. There are many ways to maintain health, for example, doing yoga at home, running or going jogging around the park, or swimming at the beach, which does not only help us stay strong but also feel comfortable and relaxing, save time and money. Moreover, flexible combinations between these methods in different situations which are convenient make a good habit, therefore, we can keep the frequency of doing exercises.
In conclusion, raising the number of sports equipment is a good method to strengthen our health, and combining several measures is also a better choice for everyone. However, we would better choose the convenient one which suits us.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-10-25 | MinyiChu | 61 | view |
2023-07-14 | Ediyorbek521 | 89 | view |
2023-07-02 | lydia231232 | 89 | view |
2023-07-02 | lydia231232 | 89 | view |
2022-11-24 | Alili | 67 | view |
- Explain some of the way in which humans are damaging the environment What can governments do to address these problem What can individual people do 11
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarise the information by reporting and selecting main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the type of relationships people make Has this become positive or negative development 78
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottle Summarise the information by reporting and selecting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films Why could this be Should governments give more financial support to local film industries 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0824742268 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52623368175 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615120274914 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8979514164 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.25 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6666666667 7.06120827912 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264495176008 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0865634950935 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0787233892576 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154312478692 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063607963786 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.