Some people say that drug companies have the responsibility to spend money on researching medicine to help the poorer countries，others think the main responsibility of drug companies is making money. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
Thanks to many doctors and scientists, without their research on illness human can’t overcome the lethal disease. However, there are some drug companies invest special medicine not to help reducing pain on patients but to make money and I totally disagree with this. I believe money should never be their priority.
Lots of drug companies’ managers will debate that the companies need money to make the research. People can’t imagine how hard and how expensive for scientists to create a new effective medicine to help patient recover from disease. So the companies raise the drug price not only for earning money but also for opening their next research on fatal virus or bacteria. Moreover, doing research need expensive equipment and employ bachelors which also cost loads of money. But, the truth is, nearly all the drug companies have made the price too exorbitant to normal people and only a small group of individuals, always the rich, can afford it.
So we need to rethink that should those drug companies focus on making money and ignore poor people’s live. Many medicines are created to save people but because of its high price, only the rich people can use it. And poor patients are still suffering from pain and their rest of life will live in desperate. The situation become worst if financial rewards become the sole objective of all the drug companies. The bills will spoil out patients’ life quality and all the money are occupied by rogue drug companies. And somehow, these profits maybe will not use in doing research.
Overall, patients’ well-being always should be the paramount consideration. The drug companies can get investment from government if they face financial problem, but the fees should not be shouldered by patients themselves.
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. why is this the case? what can be done about this problem? 73
- The graphs show enrolment in different colleges in the Higher Colleges of Technology in 1999.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information given. 73
- The two charts below compare the populations of France and India in the age distribution and gender in 1984. 73
- The table below gives information of weekly level of consumption by different age groups in ordinary milk and butter healthy alternative HA milk and butter in one European country Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and 70
- Children are face educational social and commercial pressures What are the causes of these pressures What measures should be taken to reduce them 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to reduce' or 'reduce'.
Suggestion: to reduce; reduce
...ies invest special medicine not to help reducing pain on patients but to make money and ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun drug seems to be countable; consider using: 'Lots of drugs'.
Suggestion: Lots of drugs
...ey should never be their priority. Lots of drug companies' managers will debate th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 329, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'become the worst'.
Suggestion: become the worst
...e will live in desperate. The situation become worst if financial rewards become the sole ob...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1519.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20205479452 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66962543838 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565068493151 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.477918848 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9375 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 7.06120827912 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277674080158 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0993231153918 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0851522575434 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175066057741 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0747544129657 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.