Technology brought a profound change in all aspects of life. A fair number of people argue that traditional newspapers and magazines will totally replaces by e books and technology. From my perspective I completely agree with the given statement. E-books and modern technology are more efficient than the traditional newspapers.
There are numerous reasons why technology replaces newspapers. Reading newspapers from mobile phones tablets or other electronic gadgets is a very easy and simple way to get news. Mobile application provides plethora of comfort to a reader than reading from a newspaper. For example, at any place one can access to news by the help of many mobile apps like news hunt, way to SMS, news 360, news freed. During the journey hours one can use the electronic device with ease and go through the Bulltin. Moreover, by using electronic media one can get enormous information about any activities happened instantly. Whereas in traditional newspapers the information given is so limited. Newspapers printing and publishing them is really long process whereas in digital apps adding the information is like a piece of cake and done in a very short period. There are also an entirely different set of evidences to strengthen my view point.
Digital media provides the visuals and video clips which is more effective than the newspaper. In addition, the mobile application provides both video clipping and the pdf copies of the daily news. By accessing to the digital media one can get the oldest news with in no time but this type of option is not available for the traditional newspapers.lastly, using electronic applications helps in reducing usage of paper greatly.
To conclude that the traditional newspapers will completely replaces by the technology. The ongoing technology has the huge advantage and benefits than the newspapers.
- Both government and individuals are spending too much money protecting animals and their habitat. This money should be better spent dealing with fundamental issues in society such as poverty and health care. To what extent do you agree?
- rising university fees and scarce employment prospects for graduates have led some people to say that universities should not teach arts subjects, like philosophy and history, and only offer practical degree courses that maximize chances of employment. To 78
- Giving lectures in auditoriums to large numbers of students is an old way of teaching. With the technology available today, there is no justification for it, and everything should be done online. To what extend do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion. 73
- More and more business and individuals are choosing to communicate either professionally or socially using technology rather than being face to face. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using technology for communicating 78
- Rising university fees and scarce employment prospects for graduates have led some people say that universities should not teach arts subjects, like philosophy and history, and only offer practical degree courses that maximise chances of employment. To wh 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 147, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'replace'
Suggestion: replace
...l newspapers and magazines will totally replaces by e books and technology. From my pers...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cient than the traditional newspapers. There are numerous reasons why technolog...
^^^
Line 3, column 610, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...bout any activities happened instantly. Whereas in traditional newspapers the informati...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 61, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'replace'
Suggestion: replace
... traditional newspapers will completely replaces by the technology. The ongoing technolo...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, lastly, moreover, really, so, then, whereas, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26510067114 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94578315473 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546979865772 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.3105613707 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.1666666667 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5555555556 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167504132636 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065657109556 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0905868093301 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145975785285 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121176099331 0.056905535591 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.