Some people say that E- books and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspaper and magazines to what extent do you agree or disagree
<span id="docs-internal-guid-4ffb373e-7fff-5463-1cac-2e64115032d1"><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: transparent; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; vertical-align: baseline;">Nowadays, e-book and modern technology have translated the form of reading method which gives readers other choices than traditional newspapers and magazines. However, do they really able to substitute old reading method completely in future? In this essay, I would argue that the convenient of e-book and modern technology can only replace a minority of traditional newspapers and magazines, while traditional newspapers and magazines are more reliable and affordable.</span></p><br><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: transparent; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; vertical-align: baseline;">The e-book and advance tech are more convenient than traditional newspaper and magazines. In contrast, the electrical devices provide higher accessibility, while the actual papers are harder to carry and obtain. For instance, people can just simply use their phone to purchase newspapers and magazines by mere a push of a button which traditional form of reading will never achieve. Moreover, e-book and modern tech are capable to carry more information than paper which traditional newspapers and magazines only appear a smaller amount of knowledge. Therefore, the ebook and advance tech can replace traditional newspaper and magazines in the way of which by providing convenient.</span></p><br><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: transparent; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; vertical-align: baseline;">On the other hand, the traditional newspapers and magazines are more reliable and affordable than modern technology and e-book. Unlike devices, traditional newspaper and magazines print in papers do not depend on the electricity supply, they can be read instantly whatever the condition of the devices are. Albeit the devices have enough electricity, they are generally more expensive compare to traditional newspaper and magazines. For example, a person grows up in a destitute family who suffers from a financial problem will not able to afford an e-book. Hence,if e-book and modern technology replaced the traditional newspaper and magazines completely, the person would lose the opportunity of getting more information. Even though e-book and modern technology are more convenient, the traditional newspaper and magazines should always exist in future. </span></p><br><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: transparent; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; vertical-align: baseline;">To recapitulate, the e-books and modern tech can take place of traditional newspaper and magazines by providing convenient, but traditional newspaper and magazines are more outstanding in reliability and lower cost, thus they will not be completely outraced and substituted.</span></p><br></span>
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 2703, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , if
...will not able to afford an e-book. Hence,if e-book and modern technology replaced t...
^^^
Line 1, column 2986, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...paper and magazines should always exist in future.
^^^^^^^^^Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, moreover, really, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 29.0 10.4138276553 278% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3191.0 1615.20841683 198% => OK
No of words: 413.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 7.72639225182 5.12529762239 151% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 8.89539080277 2.80592935109 317% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.430992736077 0.561755894193 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 903.6 506.74238477 178% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.2 1.60771543086 137% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 204.425446835 49.4020404114 414% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 245.461538462 106.682146367 230% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 31.7692307692 20.7667163134 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.84615384615 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.38176352705 23% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1908331288 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114114970294 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708539443522 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1908331288 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 30.9 13.0946893788 236% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -10.75 50.2224549098 -21% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 17.1 7.44779559118 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 22.5 11.3001002004 199% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 28.15 12.4159519038 227% => Coleman_liau_index is high.
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 26.0 9.78957915832 266% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 31.0 10.7795591182 288% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.