Some human beings utter that e-book and neoteric technology will entirely substitute conventional newspapers and fanzines. I strongly agree with it. In this essay, I will clarify my notion.
Fristly, I perceive they are adp for all ages. Youngsters find gen and knowlegde which they require quickly and easily. And adults lookk for related news about companies, wars, pademic, financial systems over the world. For instance, a schoolchild want to find info for homework, they can utilize leading-edge techonology. And stay-at-home people can also exert to learn how to cook and look after their infants. By contrast with newspapers and fanzines, we don’t have to queue up to buy them. We can read and access anytime without money.
Secondly, e-books and state-of-the-art technologies are handy. E-books and novel technologies always update news continually. Moreover, their monitors are sufficient function. The letters, pictures of them possess size, color, font. We can zoom in and zoom out the screens when we like. We just type in the information we want, it will immediately augment. Moreover, they are also amplified automatic reading function. In contrast to them, glossies and newspapers aren’t as newfangled as. Their letters only have one size and their pictures aren’t picturesque and honest. We are hard to find suitable motif. For example, we want to read about crimes, but they are sold out.
To sum up, both e-books and leading-edge technologies which support human life better, supersede utterly newspapers and periodicals.
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programs for example working for a charity improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Some people think that countries should limit the amount of food that they import and mainly eat products from their own country To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y substitute conventional newspapers and fanzines. I strongly agree with it. In t...
^^
Line 2, column 386, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... can also exert to learn how to cook and look after their infants. By contrast wi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in contrast, in contrast to, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1309.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 242.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40909090909 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88396893627 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.648760330579 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 391.5 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 5.43587174349 258% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 20.2975951904 54% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.7665527685 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 59.5 106.682146367 56% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.0 20.7667163134 53% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 5.36363636364 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 3.4128256513 322% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120473525636 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0353151735772 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506099891581 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0970109421598 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657640391341 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.31 50.2224549098 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.91 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.1190380762 63% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.