Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty, while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it must be stopped. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There is a school of thought that believes that the only way to end hunger and poverty is economic growth while reasons can be given to justify this, I would agree that economic growth put the environment in danger.
On the one hand, there are those who assert that economic development is the only to cure hunger and poverty. In term of social benefit, developing economic result in a increase in the level of the government budget. Thus national and local authorities can prioritize expenditure on a welfare state, which provide food and money for citizens especially the homeless. In addition, apart from maximizing profits, the growth of economic acts as a catalyst for expanding companies production and creating new job opportunities. This allows citizens to meet basic human needs and eradicates poverty.
On the other hand, I side with those who contend that the environment is being damaged by growing economic. Firstly, production processes must be held accountable for serious environmental degradation, such as global warming stemming from factory emissions or the irresponsible disposal of industrial waste. For example, instead of installing waste treatment systems, factories tend to discharge chemical waste into rivers, which leads to water pollution. Secondly, development of economic may trigger depleting natural resources. For instance, lowland rainforests have been cleared and unsustainable agricultural practices introduced to produce cash crops, often for export.
In conclusion, although it is true that growing economic is the only measure to cure hunger and poverty, I firmly believe that it would be necessary to stop this progressive turn, If it contributes to environment destruction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-22 | kieuoanh.dau | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | kieuoanh.dau | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | kieuoanh.dau | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | Mai Thu Minh | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-14 | codefree | 67 | view |
- Today more and more people are using mobile phones and computers. Thus, people are losing the ability to communicate face to face. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty, while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it must be stopped. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 67
- The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Animal species are becoming extinct as a result of human activities on land and sea. Why has this happened? What is the solutions? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... benefit, developing economic result in a increase in the level of the government...
^
Line 3, column 218, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... in the level of the government budget. Thus national and local authorities can prio...
^^^^
Line 3, column 468, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'companies'' or 'company's'?
Suggestion: companies'; company's
...onomic acts as a catalyst for expanding companies production and creating new job opportu...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, while, apart from, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53409090909 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00754474833 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2935509643 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.75 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.1666666667 7.06120827912 201% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259736799858 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867718489719 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0906043625374 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17514520169 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0938618724704 0.056905535591 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.