Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty, while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it must be stopped.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Opinion is divided as to whether economic growth is of great help to the world or not. Although such development causes damage to different natural parts of the earth, it is the most effective way to address poverty and hunger.
the opponents of economic growth often point to the fact that the integrity of nature is impacted. Such idea is predicated on certain observations especially in developing country where the quality of soil and water has been deteriorated by the excessive use of concrete and damaging building methods, ultimately affecting the natural diversity. For example, the construction of new residential area means a huge network of infrastructure which requires the clearance of different floral species. As a result, other species which are reliant on these kinds of vegetation also disappear.
Despite the aformentioned drawbacks, we cannot afford to stop the economic growth as it is the most important way to alleviate poverty and hunger. It is obvious that developing countries often attract foreign investments into rural places where the majority of poor people are residing. Therefore, new businesses and industries have been established, with the result that more jobs have been generated and the average living standards have been augmented. However, to minimize the impact of economic development on the local environment, the government should hire environmentalists to participate in the designing and building process to ensure that the local nature will be least impacted. By doing so, we can ensure that the economic development will not occur at the expense of local nature.
In conclusion, although there is some natural damage accured from economic activity, it is imperative to factor the well-being of local nature in the development of economy as it is the most prominent way to reduce poverty and hunger.
- In many countries people buy a range of household goods Is it a positive or negative development 89
- Today people are wasting large amounts of food Why What can be done to reduce the amount of food wasted 95
- some believe that money is the most important consideration when people choose a job Do you agree or disagree with this idea 90
- Many people believe that it is easier to have a healthy lifestyle in the countryside Other believe that there are health benefits of living in cities Discuss both views and give your opinions 89
- Many of the products we buy nowadays break or wear out very quickly What are the advantages and disadvantages of this for manufacturers and the public 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 20, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
Opinion is divided as to whether economic growth is of great help to the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...e way to address poverty and hunger. the opponents of economic growth often poin...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, therefore, well, as to, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34812286689 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98664259884 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556313993174 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2959210873 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.583333333 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4166666667 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21722130265 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835235093032 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722427125666 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143634081839 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447707648051 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.