Some people say that government should increase the tax on petrol in order to decrease traffic and pollution. Do you agree with this opinion?
There is increasing concern over the substantial rise in the number of private vehicles. Although the benefits brought by owning a car such as comfortable and flexible in moving, it affects adversely to the environment. Thus, some people claim that the petrol tax should be imposed heavier to mitigate traffic and the amount of exhaust emission to the environment. I partly agree with this proposition.
On the one hand, traffic in populated cities causes many problems. In particular, while traffic congestion affects negatively to an individual habit, the polluted air damages both people’s health and the environment. For example, being stuck in a heavy traffic in rush hours not only make an individual unhappy and tired but also affect directly to their work-life balance. Thus, the government should take some actions to tackle these problems. Increasing the tax on petrol may help, the expensive of the vehicle’s fuels can help one think twice before making the final decision, thus the number of private cars may witness a significant decline.
On the other hand, besides reducing the number of private vehicles, the governments also need to encourage their residents to use public transports. However, the current public transports may be uncomfortable and unreliable. In fact, the metro systems are often dirty and crowded due to the minority of low awareness people. Furthermore, in rush hours, because of the traffic jam, the train often slow and not always arrive on time. Thus, the tax which is imposed can then be allocated to establishing more reliable and user friendly public transports.
In conclusion, to protect our own health as well as the environment, I personally believe that in addition to increasing the tax on petrol, the government should spend money on building a more convenient and comfortable public transportation system.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-18 | taho.ielts | 84 | view |
- Most countries want to improve the standard of living through economic development; however, others think the social value is lost as a result of economic development. To what extent do you think the advantages of economic development outweigh its disadva 67
- Nowadays, people always throw the old things away when they buy new things, and we are living in a throw-away society. What factors cause this phenomenon? What problem does the phenomenon leads to? 84
- Some parents believe children’s leisure activities should be always educational, but others think it will cause more pressure on children. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
- Some people say that government should increase the tax on petrol in order to decrease traffic and pollution Do you agree with this opinion 73
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are the reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 250, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'heavy traffic'.
Suggestion: heavy traffic
...nvironment. For example, being stuck in a heavy traffic in rush hours not only make an individu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, then, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, in particular, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30303030303 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94241035288 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59595959596 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9474641562 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2 7.06120827912 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216028647727 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690238182236 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680728785286 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136251809904 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647683858429 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.