According to individual, parents part and parcel role play for child's future, without parents children have remain lack of lot of skills. But other people against this statement and said that not only children play a vital role but also other things like television or friends same influence on journey of children life. Firmly disagree to the given statement and I say about both sides in the following paragraph.
Analysing the statement and explain further, each coin has a flip side so I explain one side in this paragraph. First and foremost, parents give a birth to a child life and they are very vulnerable to a child's. In addition,they can learn to caring, sharing and so on. Another statement, only teachers and parents can be give goods sacrament to the children and they are learn many primary things such as how to work, how to eat, what is good or bad, etc.
To contrary, other gadget are become a powerful tool for a child's development such as televisions, mobile phone friends and so on. All people are very expect from your friends and there they can become a strong friendship. Beside this, they can be learn how to perform as a group and with friends they good relationships and develop personality. Furthermore, television also aid to develop attitude, creativity, imagination, Idea and knowledge such as they are watch some different education program.
In final words, my opinion on par with idea that parents a first priority for brain development of children, however adolescent are learn basic things from parents.
- The chart below gives information about the growth of urban population in certain parts of the world including the prediction of the future Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Some people believe that personal happiness is directly related to economic success Others believe that there are other factors Discuss both views and give your opinion 100
- The chart below shows the expenditure on three categories among different age group of residents in the UK in 2004 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that schools should stop teaching students by using books because students find them boring and that children can learn from films tv video games and computers instead 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'remained'.
Suggestion: remained
...s future, without parents children have remain lack of lot of skills. But other people...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 222, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , they
...very vulnerable to a childs. In addition,they can learn to caring, sharing and so on....
^^^^^
Line 2, column 370, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'learned', 'learnt'.
Suggestion: learned; learnt
... sacrament to the children and they are learn many primary things such as how to work...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 132, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ment of children, however adolescent are learn basic things from parents.
^^
Line 4, column 134, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'learned', 'learnt'.
Suggestion: learned; learnt
...nt of children, however adolescent are learn basic things from parents.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1284.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93846153846 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68456028156 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569230769231 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 394.2 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0820568714 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236425937765 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0803858696355 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592013519232 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138624912053 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729695033969 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.