Some people say there is no need for print newspapers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Almost in all scientific fields Today world faces with a galloping progression, one of which is in domain of e-communication. Without a shadow of a doubt, it hugely effects on broadcast-related issues, most of all on print newspapers. It brings about a polemical debate about whether the extinct of hard newspapers in tenable or not. Some certify that community no longer needs to them. I to what extend go for it, while cannot shut my eyes on its benefits.
On the one hand, those who are proponent of obviation of traditional newspapers declare that when we can avail ourselves of technology, then there is no incumbent to print newspapers, begetting some ecological matters. The more hard newspapers get published, the more trees should be cut down. By augmentation of population cutting down tend to be escalated, which negatively effecting on environment. The other matter can relate to after publishing, meaning that we have to sort out these tremendous piles of newspapers. Thus, part of them might reserve, other may use as fuel in factories and most of them should recycle.
On the other hand, there are people strongly advocating of print newspapers. First and foremost, there are even countries which technology has not advanced in. Therefore, people of this poor societies more or less have to exploit of customary newspapers. On top of this, some, mostly older people, even have not had knowledge of using up-to-the-minute technologies, namely PC, laptop, smart phone, etc. Finally, all of these conditions lead that to meet the need of society of news, the print newspapers should be published.
To recapitulate briefly, while there are some reasons for elimination of traditional newspaper, like hurting to environment and post-publishing problem. I think we have to put them out for reasons such as paucity of technology progression and inability to use of recent technology.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Adilrahi | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | msolanki | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | sepide1367 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | martinestefan | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | kiana | 61 | view |
- The Graph shows the average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 78
- Some people think having more TV channels is good because they will have more choices While other people think too many TV channels only lead to a lot of poor quality TV programs Discuss both views and give your opinion Give reasons for your answer and in 78
- In many countries women and men are working full time. It is therefore, logical for women and men to share household works. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The first graph shows the reasons for studying in the UK by age, while the second graph shows the support given by employers for training by age. 100
- Some people think that public health within a country can be improved by government making laws regarding nutritious food. Others, however, think that health is a matter of personal choice and responsibility. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 24, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...s benefits. On the one hand, those who are proponent of obviation of traditional n...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 625, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tories and most of them should recycle. On the other hand, there are people stro...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, finally, first, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, while, i think, in fact, such as, more or less, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21172638436 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12383114832 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615635179153 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7622319146 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1176470588 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0588235294 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41176470588 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190687705468 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585932105308 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594818653435 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109382658196 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034759968176 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.