Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds Do you agree or disagree about this opinion

Essay topics:

Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree about this opinion?

It is argued that protecting wild animals and birds is drawing/attracting too much
concern and too many resources of society. Personally, I totally agree with this
point of view.
There are two main reasons why I think people have paid too much attention to the
protection of animals. One reason is that many non-governmental organizations
have been established in order to protect animals all over the world. However, they
are too concerned about animal-related activities in many parts of the world. For
example, it is unreasonable that PETA, an animal-protecting (2) organization,
accused Katy Perry of using tigers and elephants in her own music video ‘Roar’
commercial purposes while she did not. Furthermore, news about wild animals can
be shared rapidly on the Internet. If a bear is imprisoned somewhere, this news will
be widespread on social networks such as Facebook on a large scale immediately.
In addition, people have also spent too many resources protecting wild birds.
Firstly, a great deal of money is required to carry out any project to protect wild
birds, in which infrastructure and research are the two most expensive. The more
difficult research to preserve the DNA of wild birds is, the more it costs. Secondly,
the expenditure for this protection is quite unnecessary to some extent. While funds
should be raised to improve the living standards in some regions, investment in
bird protection appears to be a waste of money.
In conclusion, it seems to me that both concern and resources are focused too much
on the protection of wild animals and birds in this modern world.

Votes
Average: 5.4 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-08-12 Anh Thi 89 view
2023-02-15 lehonganh1212 73 view
2023-02-15 duchuynh 67 view
2023-02-13 lehonganh1212 73 view
2021-07-20 TuronKuzibaev 51 view
Essays by user nguyengiakhue :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... elephants in her own music video ‘Roar’ commercial purposes while she did not. F...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1376.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21212121212 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11340594886 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1129317307 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2857142857 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 20.0 4.38176352705 456% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.435406588316 0.244688304435 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14951960606 0.084324248473 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112414388096 0.0667982634062 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1228585776 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0988521197886 0.056905535591 174% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.