Some people say that tourism has many negative effects on the countries that people travel to.
How true is this statement? What can tourists do to reduce the harmful effects of tourism on local cultures and environments?
Give reasons your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience
Nowadays, tourism_a smokeless industry_ has contributed an integral part to many countries' economies. While it provides numerous benefits such as creating jobs, raising the financial source or promoting these countries' images, there were also several negative effects.
Firstly, due to the requirement of providing services and facilities for tourists, nature has been damaged and the tropics have been deforested. The more tourists there are, the more roads, hotels, shopping centres have been built up and the less natural areas and forests have been preserved. For example, in some seaside cities of Vietnam, there are many resorts and luxury hotel covering the coastline instead of attractive white sand and blue sea like there used to be.
Secondly, the presence of a significant number of travellers can lead to the matter of environmental impacts. In the streets or tourist destinations, garbage seems to be everywhere because of the lack of awareness of some visitors. Moreover, when these places become more crowded, traffic jams occur and may pollute the atmosphere.
Regarding those negative impacts, the government have to take prompt action in order to improve the consequences. They may raise the visitors'awareness of environmental issues by using video clip or poster at crowded places such as airports and tourist destinations. If travellers keep littering and ignore all of the warning signs, the government need to implement some specific penalties. Nevertheless, people should focus more on eco-tours and tried to travel to less crowded areas for a new experience.
In conclusion, despite having a positive impacts on the economy, the drawbacks of tourism can't be denied. The government should applied more methods to reduce those drawbacks and continue developing the tourism.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-07-26 | band | 67 | view |
2019-05-26 | Mishika sugandhi | 78 | view |
2019-05-05 | Chaubui | 84 | view |
2015-01-16 | Fadlanmuzakki | 85 | view |
2014-12-28 | mohd326 | 55 | view |
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- In the modern world a university education is essential in order to get a rewarding job and earn a high salary To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The first chart below shows the results of a survey which sampled a cross section of 100 000 people asking if they traveled abroad and why they traveled for the period 1994 98 The second chart shows their destinations over the same period 56
- The charts show how tourism to two countries changed over a 50-year period 78
- the two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 306, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...If travellers keep littering and ignore all of the warning signs, the government need to i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 91, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...n the economy, the drawbacks of tourism cant be denied. The government should applie...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, second, secondly, so, while, as for, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50180505415 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92323378833 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649819494585 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.8925240806 49.4020404114 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.857142857 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7857142857 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2142857143 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133723205705 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0436743379646 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0300162744121 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0711322147484 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0246558727585 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.