Some people say that what children watch influences their behaviour. Others believe the amount of time they spend on television influences their behaviour most. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is a controversial issue over whether children’s behaviour is influenced by television content or long screen time. While an excessive exposure to television exerts adverse impacts on the behaviour of children, I suppose that there are manifold downsides of harmful content on television.
It stands to reason that watching TV for a long time brings several detrimental effects to youngsters. Firstly, spending a huge amount of time staring at a screen would give rise to some health issues such as obese or optical disorders. An explanation is that hardly do children have a chance to get involved in outdoor activities and physical exercises which plays an integral part in their physical development. Secondly, excessive screen time would deprive teenagers of the opportunity to interact with others. As a result, young individuals might have difficulties in expanding their social circle as well as expressing their ideas.
On the other hand, there is little room for doubt that harmful contents would be detrimental to the youth. First, there is an uncontrolled growth of unhealthy contents which put the formative years of childhood in jeopardy. This can be illustrated the fact that there are an excessive number of television programmes which encompass scenes of violence, sex, even crime. Furthermore, unhealthy television contents enable to pave the way for children’s rule-breaking behaviours, unexpectedly criminal behaviours. Because children are extremely curious and vulnerable, it is possible for them to imitate what they see without thinking.
In conclusion, although the disadvantages of spending a long time watching TV are obvious, I subscribe to the opinion that unhealthy information on television puts youngsters’ behaviour at stake.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-09-24 | Pham Quy Hien | 89 | view |
2022-07-25 | wokoma elisha | 78 | view |
2021-06-18 | thiendinh | 78 | view |
2021-06-18 | newbie3107 | 78 | view |
2021-06-12 | newbie3107 | 73 | view |
- Many developing countries are currently expanding their tourist industries Why is this the case Is it a positive development 73
- People tend to work longer hours nowadays Working long hours has a negative effect on themselves their families and the society so working hours should be restricted Do you agree or disagree 73
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with that statement 73
- Some people prefer to have temporary jobs which means they only work a few months in a year and use the rest of the time to do what they want What is your opinion 73
- Some people say that what children watch influences their behaviour Others believe the amount of time they spend on television influences their behaviour most Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, i suppose, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56296296296 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15242411134 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607407407407 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.381796079 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 115.538461538 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7692307692 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1538461538 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250935007043 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783322910381 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607656884338 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149032517947 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489580620833 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.