Some people they that interview is the best method in recruiting staff but others say there are better ways. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In the modern world of work, interview is arguably the most popular method of selecting employees in the world. Some people even claim that it is also the best way to do the job but others disagree. In my opinion, the nature of the career would decide how suitable interview is in staff selection process.
On the one hand, I agree that interview is absolutely necessary in most cases for two compelling reasons. Firstly, this is a perfect chance to employers to know more about their potential staff. Apart from basic information such as academic qualifications or work history that recruiters could find out easily in their candidates' CVs, they would have deeper understanding about the candidates' personalities like openness or motivation in direct communication, which is crucial in deciding who would be the most qualified to the position. Secondly, having a direct talk to the potential employer is normal the only chance for job seekers to show their skills, especially communication ones. Most of the professions nowadays do require workers to communicate one way or another; hence both the interviewers and candidates if they certainly can talk to each other before settling working relationship.
On the other hand, I also believe that interview is not necessary in recruiting new staff working in some certain fields like science or computer programming. Obviously, choosing scientists or programmers with excellent communication skills is unrealistic since they mostly do their specialized tasks with full intellectual concentration and without frequent communication to other people. Also, the values of researchers or coders, illustrated in their past projects they have accomplished, appear unequivocally in their CVs, which could be easily acknowledged by the employers within seconds of reading instead of minutes or even hours of interviewing. Therefore, there is no need for employers to talk to potential staff who they have already had enough information to take into the consideration
In conclusion, I strongly believe that interview is an effective method of recruiting staff across many occupations, but not in some highly specialized fields like science or computation.
- Influence of human beings on the world s ecosystem is leading to the extinction of species and loss of bio diversity What are the primary causes of loss of bio diversity What solutions can you suggest 62
- Food travels in thousands of miles from farm to the consumers. Many people think eating food from local people would be benificial to the environment and the economy. Do the advantages of eating local food outweigh the disadvantages? 89
- Some people think that cultural traditions will be destroyed if they are used as money-making attractions aimed at tourists. others, however, believe that is the only way to save these traditions. Discuss both these views and give your opinion 84
- Many people think that countries should import less food and produce more for their population. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people say that prisons are an expensive and only make bad people worse. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 44, Rule ID: ABSOLUTELY_ESSENTIAL[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessary'.
Suggestion: necessary
...the one hand, I agree that interview is absolutely necessary in most cases for two compelling reason...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, apart from, in conclusion, such as, in most cases, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1872.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47368421053 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14692294761 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573099415205 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 89.2859015871 49.4020404114 181% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.0 106.682146367 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8333333333 7.06120827912 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209705558191 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804427522089 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576598017498 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144761542929 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437463286783 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.