Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
People have different views about how many choices students should have with regard to what they can study in university. While some argue that it would be better for students to be forced into certain key subject areas, I believe that everyone should be able to study the course of their choice.
On the one hand, there are various reasons while people believe that universities should only offer subjects that will be useful in the future. They may assert that university courses like medicine, engineering, and information technology are more likely to be beneficial than certain art degrees. From a personal perspective, it can be argued that these courses could provide more job opportunities, career progression, better salary, and therefore an improved quality of life. On the societal level, by forcing people to choose particular university subjects, governments can ensure that any knowledge and skill gaps in the economy are covered. Finally, a focus on technology in higher education can lead to new inventions, economic growth, and greater future prosperity.
On the other hand, I believe that university students should be free to choose their preferred areas of study. Firstly, society will benefit more if our students are passionate about what they are learning. Secondly, nobody can predict which areas of knowledge will be most useful in the future, and it may be that employers begin to value creative thinking skills above practical or technical skills. If this were the case, perhaps we would need more students of art, history, and philosophy than of science and technology.
In conclusion, although it might seem sensible for universities to focus only on the most useful subjects, I preferred the current system in which people have the right to study whatever they like.
- Some universities now offer their courses on the internet so that people can study online Is this a positive or negative development 78
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is considered very important Why might this be the case Is this a positive or negative development 67
- What are the positives and negatives of learning a second language as a child 67
- What are the positives and negatives of learning a second language as a child 61
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of using social media sites such as Facebook 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1512.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21379310345 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67423519688 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579310344828 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.617735462 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1666666667 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.444343608273 0.244688304435 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148445639996 0.084324248473 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907504017446 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260333158547 0.151304729494 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425065091974 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.