Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
For some people, giving a right for the students to choose what to study is a worthy practice to maximize their knowledge and experience. In contrast, shaving track for the students can be more effective because it helps them to focus on the most practical lessons. In my view, there is no absolute answer to which way is better because each one has different benefit. The students need to balance between both styles in order to learn the most.
Firstly, typical children have more enthusiastic to learn about their favorite areas than the subjects that they have no interest in. The more willing to learn lead to the better results of studying, because the students will pay more attention to the class is interesting to them. For instance, one of my friend in university, who never appeared in the physics class, was always the first person who submitted the computer class assignments that he really keen on. Thus, the youths should determine their preference to learn because it will bring out the highest capacity that they could perform.
However, adults, who have more experience about the career and life, should act as a coach to manage young people to receive the most fruitful knowledge and get ready for the real world. As an adolescent, the student may cannot figure out the professional life as much as the grown-up person can. It is the teacher’s responsibility to guide the student what to learn, even though there are some tough subjects that is too hard for an average person to understand.
In conclusion, there are advantages in both ways of learning: allowing the students to choose their own lessons makes them learn better and giving the suitable guide can help them in their professions. The university students should attain both means so that they will get the most of their valuable time in the university.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 61
- Governments should spend money on railways ratherthan roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- Reading materialIn many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people has a wider rang 83
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 67
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements?“In twenty year there will be fewer cars in use than there are today”Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 161, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to lead'
Suggestion: to lead
... interest in. The more willing to learn lead to the better results of studying, beca...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d for an average person to understand. In conclusion, there are advantages in b...
^^^
Line 7, column 130, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...oose their own lessons makes them learn better and giving the suitable guide can help ...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'firstly', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'really', 'so', 'thus', 'for instance', 'in conclusion', 'in contrast', 'in my view']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.201729106628 0.247107183377 82% => OK
Verbs: 0.149855907781 0.155533422707 96% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0806916426513 0.0946595960268 85% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0489913544669 0.0501214627716 98% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0547550432277 0.0437548338989 125% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.112391930836 0.122226691241 92% => OK
Participles: 0.0172910662824 0.0403226058552 43% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.56894042936 2.80594681477 92% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0547550432277 0.0326793684256 168% => OK
Particles: 0.00576368876081 0.00163938923432 352% => OK
Determiners: 0.118155619597 0.0861772015684 137% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0345821325648 0.021408717616 162% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0201729106628 0.011925033212 169% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1848.0 1933.35771543 96% => OK
No of words: 313.0 316.048096192 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.90415335463 6.12580529183 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20517956788 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.335463258786 0.374742101984 90% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.239616613419 0.28420135186 84% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.178913738019 0.203846283523 88% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0926517571885 0.137316102897 67% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56894042936 2.80594681477 92% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.037074148 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549520766773 0.56093040696 98% => OK
Word variations: 57.9757581263 60.7387585426 95% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0891783567 81% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0769230769 20.7743622355 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8526908455 49.517814964 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.153846154 127.492653851 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0769230769 20.7743622355 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.923076923077 0.814263465372 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.99599198397 75% => OK
Readability: 48.0385844188 49.1944974215 98% => OK
Elegance: 1.30681818182 1.69124875643 77% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322407922374 0.332605444948 97% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.12377971787 0.102741220458 120% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0464039453807 0.0668466124924 69% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.627132787198 0.534860350844 117% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0880411569752 0.148594505496 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151475396174 0.134430193775 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555324306458 0.0742795772207 75% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.400251766786 0.324371583561 123% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0948761262764 0.0638462369009 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228802608513 0.228012699653 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0161787190898 0.058150111329 28% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.68436873747 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.41683366733 88% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 5.90881763527 152% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.5751503006 39% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 1.9629258517 153% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 10.4468937876 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.