Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
For some people, giving a right for the students to choose what to study is a worthy practice to maximize their knowledge and experience. In contrast, shaving track for the students can be more effective because it helps them to focus on the most practical lessons. In my view, there is no absolute answer to which way is better because each one has different benefit. The students need to balance between both styles in order to learn the most.
To begin with, typical children have more enthusiastic to learn about their favorite areas than the subjects that they have no interest in. The more willing to learn lead to the better results of studying, because the students will pay more attention to the class is interesting. For instance, one of my friend in university, who never appeared in the physics class, was always the first person who submitted the computer class assignments. Thus, the youths should determine their preference to learn because it will bring out the highest capacity that they could perform.
However, adults, who have more experience about the career and life, should act as a coach to manage young people to receive the most fruitful knowledge and get ready for the real world. As an adolescent, the student may cannot figure out the professional life as much as the grown-up person can. It is the teacher’s responsibility to guide the student what to learn, even though there are some tough subjects that is too hard for an average person to understand.
In conclusion, there are advantages in both ways of learning: allowing the students to choose their own lessons brings out the better study results and giving the suitable guide can help the students in the professional life. The university students should attain both means so that they will get the most of their valuable time in the university.
- In general, people are not as concerned as they were a decade ago about regulating their intake of red meat and fatty cheeses. Walk into the Heart's Delight, a store that started selling organic fruits and vegetables and whole-grain flours in the 1960's, 70
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
- Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him. One such painting is known as attributed to Rembrandt because of its style, and 80
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support.Use specific reasons and examples to support your an 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to lead'
Suggestion: to lead
... interest in. The more willing to learn lead to the better results of studying, beca...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'thus', 'for instance', 'in conclusion', 'in contrast', 'in my view', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.208092485549 0.247107183377 84% => OK
Verbs: 0.147398843931 0.155533422707 95% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0838150289017 0.0946595960268 89% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0462427745665 0.0501214627716 92% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0404624277457 0.0437548338989 92% => OK
Prepositions: 0.109826589595 0.122226691241 90% => OK
Participles: 0.0173410404624 0.0403226058552 43% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.5918054752 2.80594681477 92% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0549132947977 0.0326793684256 168% => OK
Particles: 0.00867052023121 0.00163938923432 529% => OK
Determiners: 0.127167630058 0.0861772015684 148% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0346820809249 0.021408717616 162% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0202312138728 0.011925033212 170% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1847.0 1933.35771543 96% => OK
No of words: 312.0 316.048096192 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.91987179487 6.12580529183 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20517956788 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.339743589744 0.374742101984 91% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.24358974359 0.28420135186 86% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.179487179487 0.203846283523 88% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0929487179487 0.137316102897 68% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5918054752 2.80594681477 92% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.037074148 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.56093040696 96% => OK
Word variations: 56.101996458 60.7387585426 92% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0891783567 81% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.7743622355 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.952232079 49.517814964 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.076923077 127.492653851 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7743622355 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.846153846154 0.814263465372 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.99599198397 25% => OK
Readability: 48.358974359 49.1944974215 98% => OK
Elegance: 1.43209876543 1.69124875643 85% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320742004396 0.332605444948 96% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.133466877413 0.102741220458 130% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0584529211788 0.0668466124924 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.638295193799 0.534860350844 119% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.103106054405 0.148594505496 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153782312466 0.134430193775 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581638271276 0.0742795772207 78% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.434570180039 0.324371583561 134% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0515529593495 0.0638462369009 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233893072642 0.228012699653 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.021072800986 0.058150111329 36% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.68436873747 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.41683366733 88% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 5.90881763527 152% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.5751503006 39% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 1.9629258517 153% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 10.4468937876 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.