Some people think that the best way to motivate and encourage people to work hard is to pay them based on how much they produce and sell. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
People seem to advocate paying a salary that accounts for the employee’s productivity and ability to sell products as an incentive to promote their labor efficiency. However, I personally disagree with this view, as social development and ethical values cannot be measured by this payment method.
Although salaries based on the ability to produce or sell are likely to increase the yield and limit lazybones, there are various professionals requiring moral qualities, particularly in areas such as pedagogy and service. For example, if a lecturer tries to teach classes as much as possible to earn more money instead of focusing on knowledge or their students, education will soon be ruined. Or if a salesman tends to ignore his customers after some successful contracts to gain another deal, the guests will no longer find his products and services appealing, leading to a decline in the company’s profits.
Furthermore, there is no denying that social progress will be associated with worthy cores such as civilization, specialization, and creativity rather than chasing the boring numbers at work. It is widely known that it will take many years for an innovation or invention that can change the world to appear. When no one wants to pay for the future and only thinks about what they can do now, geniuses and scientists may struggle to survive or conduct their trials or experiments, making them quite their motivation and desire and forget the definition of dedication.
In conclusion, I do not totally support that people should pay for employees related to what they could do. Employers should take care not only of qualities but also promises in the future and the required qualities of each job.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-03 | Trương Bảo Kiên | 11 | view |
| 2022-05-08 | Lunar Tran | 84 | view |
| 2022-05-08 | Lunar Tran | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-08 | Revivo Tulaseket | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-26 | rajpatel90 | 78 | view |
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs including uses for food and research Discu 73
- The majority of news is bad news such as wars famines accidents and crimes Why do you think that is Do you think the news should be a balance of both good and bad news 84
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs including uses for food and research Discu 78
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should spend about 20 minutes on this task Forested Land 56
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1444.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15714285714 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82792200337 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.1951217094 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.4 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19856988508 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0667190287802 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615635859805 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109574007454 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316175645912 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.