Some people think that computers and the internet are more important for a child's education than going to school. But others believe that schools and teachers are essential for children to learn effectively. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
The advent of the Internet introduces more learning opportunities to children and even threaten traditional education popularity. I strongly believe that online courses would not outweigh the traditional schools.
Admittedly, it sounds plausible that technology could offer a better education for adolescents compared with traditional schooling. Online learning courses allow students to acquire knowledge without the limitations of time and venue. Children could control the study content and schedule by themselves freely. Hence, they can avoid lacking education from some physical difficulties. For instance, the computer could assistant disabled pupils accepting equally academic training as normal children by studying at home. This advanced education method brings convenience to them.
Although the statement above seems understandable, I still believe that traditional schooling method has more benefit for the comprehensive development of teenagers. Firstly, professional educators would give tailor-made courses to different students after analyzing their personalities. Therefore, the psychological change of adolescents could be observed well in such an important growth period. Secondly, receiving education in school is an efficient way to help children building a solid foundation of social life. Students need to interact with teachers and exchange their academic opinions with counterparts during the traditional education process. In this situation, the team spirit and leadership skills of teenagers could gain a rapid promotion. For example, the traditional education system introduces group games and team projects among teaching procedure. Thus, teenagers have to keep communicating with different kind of people to exchange ideas and share their common topics. In this way, their social skills could improve through a fun experience by cooperating with peers.
In conclusion, personally, I think although contemporary tools could introduce some convenience to children studying knowledge, traditional schooling is more suitable for guiding teenagers in their academic life.
- Some people think that computers and the internet are more important for a child's education than going to school. But others believe that schools and teachers are essential for children to learn effectively. Discuss both views and give your own opin 61
- Nowadays more and more jobs and tasks are done by machines which involve hard physical work Do these positive effects of this trend outweigh the negative effects 81
- Some people believe that in order to reduce crimes, prisoners should be given longer prison sentences while some people think there are other alternative ways. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 56
- Some people believe that teachers and parents should supervise children s activities closely while others think they need more freedom Discuss both views and give your own opinion 74
- Some people believe that in order to reduce crimes prisoners should be given longer prison sentences while some people think there are other alternative ways Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1810.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.19863013699 5.12529762239 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06629844458 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619863013699 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.8042143042 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.555555556 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2222222222 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61111111111 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216985632352 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634856843327 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498773408915 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141390497607 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0178086125942 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.86 50.2224549098 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.38 12.4159519038 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.