Some people think that developed countries have a higher responsibility to combat climate change than developing countries. Others believe that all countries should have the same responsibilities towards protecting the environment.
With the world is getting warmer, it is controversial whether developed countries should take more responsibilities. In my view, developed countries ought to do more effort to save the planet from the threat of climate change due to their historical responsibility.
One often hears the argument that it is all very well to preach equity but given the planetary emergency the world face from combat climate change we must put aside the equity principle in the interests of humanity as a whole. Furthermore, developing countries are likely discharging more and more source of fossil-fuel emission. For example, China is today’s biggest emitter, as they may emit twice as much carbon dioxide as the United States. Therefore, some people claim that it is a global responsibility to solve the current problem.
However, what many people fail to realize is that global warming is the consequence of the stock of greenhouse gas emissions, which has accumulated in the Earth’s atmosphere as a result of fossil fuel based industrial activity in the industrialized countries of the world. So I would argue that if developed countries do not make significant and absolute reductions in their emissions, there will be a progressively smaller carbon space available to accommodate the development needs of developing countries. Developing countries are doing much more than most developed countries, adopting economical energy methods of growing, conserving energy, promoting renewable, etc. For example, China’s emissions per person are still much lower than the United States’. On average, each Chinese citizen with a much smaller environmental footprint. In addition, they could do more if they had access to finance, technology and capacity building from developed countries.
To summarize, countries can contribute according to capacities and resource availability. At the same times, developed countries should be accountable for fossil-fuel-intensive economies since the industrial revolution. Also, they should provide more funds and high-tech support for dedicate to this problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-20 | Hussey | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-30 | MMM13 | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-25 | Krushnagopal | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-19 | eppa akhil | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | cuongthkl0202 | 61 | view |
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled tea and pineapples in 2010 and 2015 in five European countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The table below gives information about a restaurant’s average sales in three different branches in 2016.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The table shows the percentages of mobile phone owners using various mobile phone features. 78
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both these views 67
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, well, for example, in addition, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1786.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66984126984 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29385541533 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.896142111 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.066666667 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.93333333333 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288795536246 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0916719208368 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582049613815 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171500190552 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0244502700083 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.