Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
The question whether environmental issues should be tackled in each country separately or at the international level has been a matter of debate since the beginning of the twenty-first century. While there are several benefits of addressing those problems domestically, I would argue that it is better to consider environmental questions as worldwide concerns.
On the one hand, environmental problems occur in every nation, however each one has its own solutions to deal with. Some decide to face with it by enhancing citizen's cognition. Some conjoin with others to enter upon campaigns or spreading messages to the world. Upgrading infrastructure is also commonly chosen by the governments of most countries. Distinct countries have different methods to tackle environmental issues along with improving their national systems.
On the other hand, we can't deny the fact that most of the countries have the same concerns about ecosystem. Solving those matters globally can bring a range of benefits for nations involved in. We will have prolific ideas of how to protect the planet from people across the globe. As a result, this can be of help for the environmental situations. Furthermore, movements and campaigns about environment not only have positive impacts on the nature but also connect people from different nationalities. Consequently, this lead to a firmly solidarity between countries, which is crucial for reciprocal benefits and international development.
In conclusion, although addressing environmental problems on a nation scale has merits, I believe that to tackle cosmopolitan is the best way to eradicate those issues as well as to save the world
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-10 | kaylee xo | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-16 | pitruchhaya | 78 | view |
| 2019-06-18 | Maris | 61 | view |
| 2019-05-19 | dilipkarki | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-19 | dilipkarki | 11 | view |
- Responsible tourist could preserve both the local culture and environment. Some people think it is impossible to be a responsible tourist. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 78
- Individual can do nothing to improve the environment, only government and big companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[5]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "The question"?
Suggestion: Whether
The question whether environmental issues should be tackled ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 23, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...nal systems. On the other hand, we cant deny the fact that most of the countrie...
^^^^
Line 9, column 530, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('firmly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('solidarity') instead of another adjective.
...tionalities. Consequently, this lead to a firmly solidarity between countries, which is crucial for...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, so, well, while, as to, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1427.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50965250965 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15581743348 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.629343629344 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1698709183 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.928571429 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92857142857 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210179525326 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637323528161 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394416460356 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117160887846 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287054811267 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.