Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
It is widely accepted that, climate change is the serious concern for all over the world. It is often argued that joining hands from all over the nations is the positive sign to control the worse climate condition whilst, others disagree and think that individual country’s concern is enough to control the impact of climate change. This essay agrees that the sense of unity from multiple countries definitely create the environment more friendly to the humanity and sustainable climate condition as well. This essay will discuss both point of view.
It is clear that, a serious concern and multiple contributions from all over the world are widely focused to maintain positive change on ongoing pollution. Significant numbers of countries are gathered together and paid attention in regards to finding multiple action with the help of joint dialogues and research, from where every species in the world can have healthy environment. It is therefore agreed that, friendly environment is most important phenomenon for survival. For example, a recent study of 2018 conducted by “Ministry of Environment Nepal” shows that, 10% of the national budget have spent annually on global purpose of making sustainable climate change.
However, many disagree and feel that physical distance of the countries for joint action may distract countries from mainstreaming issue. It is very hard to every nations to join in one platform and put forward their ideas every time related to the climate change and sometimes it also leads to political influence on their agenda from rich country to the poor one. Despite this, specific effort from individual country cannot create significant output in the global issue and therefore this essay disagrees the view of separate effort for the global issue.
In conclusion, while unified action from the world around can make the significant contribution to balance the degredeous world environment, some people still feel that for the world issue specific contribution from individual country is more enough. However, I personally think that collaborative actions allow more strength to the countries to deal with such an important issue of the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-10 | kaylee xo | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-16 | pitruchhaya | 78 | view |
| 2019-06-18 | Maris | 61 | view |
| 2019-05-19 | dilipkarki | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-19 | dilipkarki | 11 | view |
- Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 78
- The graphs below show the types of music albums purchased by people in Britain according to sex and age. 67
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both views and give your 73
- The graphs below show the numbers of male and female workers in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the Republic of Freedonia. 67
- It is thought by some that it is better to live in a city while others believe that life is better in the countryside. Discuss both view and give your opinion. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 230, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...re gathered together and paid attention in regards to finding multiple action with the help o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1852.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36811594203 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73885283464 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510144927536 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 571.5 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.7369826664 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.461538462 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5384615385 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92307692308 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0720740635454 0.244688304435 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0294638862138 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0323100736332 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0488303200706 0.151304729494 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288876122628 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.