Some people think that everyone has the right to have access to university education, and that governments should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion.
There has been an increasingly popularised opinion that university education should be available to the public and students should receive free college courses, regardless of their financial condition. While this idea can be beneficial to a certain degree, I disagree with it for the following reasons.
Initially, proponents of free university courses may argue that underprivileged students can have the same opportunity to receive an extensive education as their friends. There are over 7,000 young people, according to a recent report, who attend vocational courses rather than university since their parents cannot afford their tuition fees. Hence, from this perspective, the rate at which students register to universities will increase as fees are no longer a problem for them. Additionally, the lectures in tertiary education are obviously too obscure for students to understand comprehensively. Therefore, a more effective acquisition of knowledge can be ensured if they study the course beforehand.
However, considering the effectiveness in which students learn new knowledge at school, uncontrolled access to university courses could act as a hindrance. If a person with low critical thinking skills gets exposed to advanced knowledge that is inappropriate for their educational background, he is likely to complicate the exercise of the lessons he learns at school, worsening his academic performance. Another point worth considering is that students will not appreciate the intrinsic value of education. If people do not have to pay for something, they will take it for granted and find it worthless. A salient example can be seen in an experiment conducted by a famous YouTuber. He announced that he would give everyone a free trip to Paris in a luxurious hotel. Immediately, hundreds of people contacted him but soon postponed the trip. Similarly, if students can easily have access to university courses, they will not have the desire to get better in their academic path, leading to a poor attendance record in university. Consequently, they will find themselves falling behind with their studies.
In conclusion, while free college courses can exert several advantages, I am more inclined to the view that university education should not be publicized and obtained without any payment. It is recommended that the government cover part of the tuition fees for disadvantaged students’ education to give them a chance to advance their knowledge.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-01 | tteruchan65 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | Kiwi | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-30 | dieulinhxinhgai | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-30 | dieulinhxinhgai | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-30 | dieulinhxinhgai | 61 | view |
- Large businesses have big budgets for marketing and promotion and as a result people gravitate toward buying their products What problems does this cause What could be done to encourage people to buy local products 78
- It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think students should spend time on other important subjects Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- Some people believe that everyone has a right to have access to university education and that governments should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Many young people regularly change their jobs over the years What are the reasons for this Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, however, if, may, similarly, so, therefore, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2095.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 380.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51315789474 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13838159856 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576315789474 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 664.2 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6977593454 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.388888889 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276543584399 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0818351591249 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528137850294 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168518699007 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353161233921 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, however, if, may, similarly, so, therefore, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2095.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 380.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51315789474 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13838159856 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576315789474 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 664.2 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6977593454 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.388888889 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276543584399 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0818351591249 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528137850294 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168518699007 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353161233921 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.