Some people think that government should provide subsidy to the farmers for producing cheap and healthy food. Others think that government should tax the company producing unhealthy food. Discuss both view and give your opinion
The ultimated goal of modern government to ensure the safety standards of their native nation. Presently, some proportion of masses believe that subsidy provided to the farmers by governing bodies could be a lucrative idea in order to produce affordable and fresh food. By contrast, others, assert that imposing heavy tax by government on firm generating unhygienic food is a reliable panacea. Here, I would like to accout for both side with my own perception.
There are manifold points to shore the former view. First and foremost, monetary assistance given to farmers in the form of subsidy contribute remarkably to encourage the farmers to produce quality food. For instance, in some nations, price of farming equipments, seeds and machines is out of the budget of farmers; therefore, they unable to afford expensive quality seeds which produce healthy crop. Hence, farmers can buy fresh seeds and generate healthy food if government of a nation provide pecuniary endorsement to farmers. What is more, unethical practices followed by farmers to make both ends meet can be restricted. To make it clear, in this era of inflation, farmers find harculean task to fulfil their aspirations and therefore, they use the chemical spray on their crop in order to enhance the production. In this way, they earn more money and complete their desires. Consequently, monetary assistance given to farmers is fruitful so that they can complete their aspirations without following any wrong way.
Numerous points can be put down to endorse the latter view. Initially, firms having money spinning approach also produce unhealthy food and therefore government should impose tax. To demonstrate, organizations use chemicals, colouring flavours and food preservation to maximize the sale of their products. Besides this, some firms have mean stretegies as they use the cheap materials but sale them at hight price when their product become prominent. Needless to say, governing bodies should impose heavy tax so that organizations do not produce unhealthy food.
To recapitulate, undeniable, monetary endorsement to farmers has positive outcomes. However, what benefits we would miss if government does not impose tax on firm is something we should think about it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-21 | gagan_bajwa | 92 | view |
- Some people think that government should provide subsidy to the farmers for producing cheap and healthy food Others think that government should tax the company producing unhealthy food Discuss both view and give your opinion 92
- Some people think that administration should spend money in cultural event and historical site However other claim that government should invest on some other important things discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Some people believe that it is better to build new museum and town hall instead of renovating the old ones To what extent do you agree or disagree Give your opinion and relevant examples 61
- The days many people do little or no exercise at all and they have health problems as a result Why do not many people get enough exercise what can be done about it 78
- Nowadays many people with families leave their country to work abroad What are benefits and drawbacks of this Trend Give your opinion and include any relevant example 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, so, therefore, for instance, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1903.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37570621469 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80518146635 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581920903955 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8836271966 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.157894737 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6315789474 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36842105263 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349809110225 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0989703183946 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087165296794 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207168811763 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499877099952 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.